>>/51278/
An "anarchist president" is an oxymoron, the very act of participating in elections legitimizes the state. But perhaps he sees himself as a man of action and not purely as a man of opinions, though he has very strong opinions. He leads a coalition of about a dozen parties, so he might be more of a negotiator than he seems. But he'll have too much entrenched Peronist opposition, and the usual brand of populists will probably be back in power in 5 or 10 years.

 >>/51280/
> Is that even possible? Does that have any precedent?
Venezuela, kind of.
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/the-boom-is-over-venezuelans-lament-end-brief-dollarization-boost-2023-09-01/