>>/15/
>  This is not a level of conviction that will listen to arguments - as you've yourself noticed it's a result of your experianced - so if it is to be rectified it will also be by experience

I love arguments. If you can give me any suggestions that can be implemented into the project, then I would love to hear them. I do not stick my head in the sand and I love constructive criticism.

>  You have a point about group-think but you haven't properly identified the problem and you'll get caught in a never ending struggle against each new case of it's symptoms.

What is the problem, then? I don't think I'll have any issue struggling, identifying the issue is very easy to do.

Cheat sheet:
1: Does it disrupt discussion?
It's a maymay

2: Is it low-quality, or contribute nothing?
It's a maymay

3: Is it neither of the above?
It's not a maymay.

>  People prone to reliance on group-think will always find a new concept to adopt without question.

Those people will naturally be repelled by the very concept of this board. It is meant to naturally repel those who rely on group-think, as this place is meant to dismantle it.

>  There are legitimate reasons to dislike reddit and its community

Reddit is not a community. It is multiple, separated; but sometimes connected, communities. Some of these communities do indeed suffer from group-think, but not all of them. For this reason, I do not think it is correct to paint Reddit as a boogeyman in itself.

Should some communities like /r/twoxchromosomes be looked down at because of their group-think mentality? Possibly. Should the entirety of Reddit be dismissed because of /r/twoxchromosomes? No, I don't think so, at least.

> Problem arises when people learn to dislike things without understanding why they do, even to a point of displaying the same qualities that have been the reason for the hate in the first place. Methods you've outlined don't counter that at all.

How would you go about handling the situation?

I think that my plans should prevent exactly what you have described, but I can always be wrong, and my ideas can always be improved.