>>/6356/
Found it. Jump to 1:41. Yeah, that section.

 >>/6371/
> ???
I just today saw that spelling, when I think they were trying to say immoral. Or very possibly immemorial? It was a little unclear, and was a screen cap of a *chan discussing the breakdown of DeripB, or at least that kind of non-thinking was the topic.

 >>/6370/
I don't think so but I should put up seven-band-tribute just because.