>>/25454/
yr makin me kek.
you are right--you do get harrassed
bc guess what?
lots of 8chan fags already get harrassed
bc if you are really active on the board
you eventually tend to take on some sort of role
that makes you identifiable.
Baker is the most obvious.
But there are others, as you point out: graphicanons, resignationanon, etc.

as it happens, this anon is not very anon on the board
only here
for now
not intentional
just like what i said above

> we are anon for a reason
that is a good thing to talk about at this point
what is the reason?
Now I'm defining anon not in terms of real name vs anything else (anon or alias), but just as anon vs alias--such that real name is never known.

The problem about being harrassed can be addressed, bc you can always change your name. Some of us change are names quite a lot for the very reason you mention--to create a moving target. Just keep moving and yr ok. (You have to stay dynamic, anyways, you can't "settle in" here, we are like the swamp fox during revolutionary war, always "on the move")
(OnTheMove would be another good alias!)

Situation keeps changing. We never expected to get deplatformed in the way we did, have to adapt--also think of ways to deal with possibility it will happen again, how to avoid/backup plans).

some are anon, some are not

we have anons on bnoard

we have anons plus other semi-anons on Q boards (bakers, other "role" fags, etc.

we have next level up (BOS like 8Bit, @fj), then site owners (codemonkeyz, jim w)

we have various Q people on yt, twitter who dip into board and send out info to those who don't come on chan boards. Many use aliases or partial aliases; some use real names but not as many (?)

So is the "total anon" model the only model? Maybe not
I was totally anon for a while
And then that changed
And i adapted
Semi-anon not bad imo
But what is the dif?
Good thing to discuss