>>/25454/ yr makin me kek. you are right--you do get harrassed bc guess what? lots of 8chan fags already get harrassed bc if you are really active on the board you eventually tend to take on some sort of role that makes you identifiable. Baker is the most obvious. But there are others, as you point out: graphicanons, resignationanon, etc. as it happens, this anon is not very anon on the board only here for now not intentional just like what i said above > we are anon for a reason that is a good thing to talk about at this point what is the reason? Now I'm defining anon not in terms of real name vs anything else (anon or alias), but just as anon vs alias--such that real name is never known. The problem about being harrassed can be addressed, bc you can always change your name. Some of us change are names quite a lot for the very reason you mention--to create a moving target. Just keep moving and yr ok. (You have to stay dynamic, anyways, you can't "settle in" here, we are like the swamp fox during revolutionary war, always "on the move") (OnTheMove would be another good alias!) Situation keeps changing. We never expected to get deplatformed in the way we did, have to adapt--also think of ways to deal with possibility it will happen again, how to avoid/backup plans). some are anon, some are not we have anons on bnoard we have anons plus other semi-anons on Q boards (bakers, other "role" fags, etc. we have next level up (BOS like 8Bit, @fj), then site owners (codemonkeyz, jim w) we have various Q people on yt, twitter who dip into board and send out info to those who don't come on chan boards. Many use aliases or partial aliases; some use real names but not as many (?) So is the "total anon" model the only model? Maybe not I was totally anon for a while And then that changed And i adapted Semi-anon not bad imo But what is the dif? Good thing to discuss