>>/26295/ pb (from main thread)
> Everything is notable to anons that can’t be on the whole bread.
Strongly disagree
If that were true, they would want to read the whole bred--which they don't.

Cognitive psychology tells us that people can only hold so much info in their minds at one time. Put too much stuff--rather that REAL notables--and we cannot absorb it. Most well established fact in the whole field.
So a critical task of the baker is to separate the wheat from the chaff.

The wheat:
- breaking news
- ongoing developments in the news
- boat & planefag reports
- new and continued anon digs, espec on Q drops
- anon discussion of digs and other relevant items
- images that directly relevant to digs (ray chandler, epstein island, etc)
- for KEKS stuff (only if really funny, don't overdo it)

The chaff:
- duplicates from previous breds or other boards (check qresear.ch)
- cool memes (they are NEVER, NEVER included; instead put in a meme thread, these are not news items)
- anon shitposts and misc musings
- lists of past notables, BV notes or other misc lists (these are duplicates)
- strategies, tactics & reminders for meme attacks (absolutely NOT notable)

This chaff clogs up notables and is not of interest to the average anon.

With long breds, notables will be fairly long, too. But they should still be as succinct as possible. Plz do NOT just throw stuff into notables, "just in case."
Better to leave stuff out, post early, and ask anons if anything is missing.