>>/7722/
You can always tell that something is a distraction when it has significant signal to noise ratio (more noise, I mean) for BOTH sides of the argument.
Jews are bad. They're generally divisive and extremely tribal. They have long been used for their having virtually no conscientiousness. This is why the Jesuits used them to do things they weren't allowed... you know, like usury.
However, Masons and Jesuits are just as important, if not more important than "Jews" (they're Hebrew because Judea was virtually insignificant and mostly just populated by interbreeding mouth breathers living in the mountains). Yes, Talmudic and especially any orthodox Hebrew is the enemy of anyone but themselves, but the extent of their control over the entire world was never centralized until the Rothschilds insisted Israel be formed under the Balfour Declaration. You will find that the Rothschild have worked in tandem with the aforementioned groups since at the very least Mayer Bauer stole control of France under his usury scheme. I wonder where he learned that...
Anyway, Masonic influence specifically was the predominant influence over most of the organized world prior to the formulation of the Jesuit orders (or at least their existence in modernity). It's also easy to assume the secret orders existed under other similar influences long before even the plan of the Abrahamic religions came to fruition.

Anyway, the point is that all of the Abrahamic religions have their glaring issues. None of them are really all that worth giving much attention to. The nearest they got to legitimacy was with Jesus or Yeshua. The story of the return of and this civilizations iteration of the Light Bringer is important. It marked a new and unforeseen era. 
This time will be very different because we're now capable of using significantly more technology, meaning we're further along in the development cycle and so now there's a decent chance of full disclosure of ETs. Should this occur, you won't really care about organized religion. 
I don't want to get too far in to this, though. This discussion is for a different time. Hopefully it should suffice to say that "something something Jews" is merely a distraction. Once people name specific people and not some ambiguous ethnicity or religion, then you should pay attention.