>>/132383/
Unfortunately the full review is lost. You can see the original discussion from when the review dropped here  >>/74160/. An anon greentexted part of it in a post ( >>/74625/)
This notorious review has been brought up several times since ( >>/105799/) with anons debating whether it was or was not racist. Many anons made good points that it was in fact extremely racist.

 >>/132385/
I don't feel like re-hashing this whole thing but I think you're being a little disingenuous. Yes, there were in fact people on letterboxd calling her out. Okay, she deletes reviews sometimes. But most of her reviews are still up. There must be a reason she deletes certain reviews and not others. So why did she delete this ''specific' review? (We should also consider that the other reviews she deleted also may have contained latent racism and that was the reason for their removal.) And I think it has to be said that this review wasn't just a one-off or an isolated incident; Kennedi has a long and well-documented history of racism and problematic views and behaviour, and this review has to be looked at and understood through that lens.