>>/141516/
please give me an honest answer.
She's 19. She's extremely attractive to a lot of men. She's got a low body count. You say she's used goods, but how do you arrive at this conclusion that she's "used goods?" 
I don't think I knew a single peer when I was 19 that had slept with as few people as she has and getting leaked doesn't make her used goods. I hope you're not suggesting that because other men have seen her body without her consent, that it's damning against her. 
Sure, she trusted people she shouldn't have trusted. That doesn't mean anything more than the fact that she liked her bfs and did the exact same thing that most 19yo girls do for their bfs. If your rebuttal is predicated on a judgement that starts with her being leaked, then don't even respond. Sharing thirst traps is not anything new nor is it bad. What generation do you live in that would call a girl used goods because she shared some thirst traps?

Seriously. Don't strawman or ad hominen here. Give me an actual response. If you give me a well constructed response, I'll honor a good faith argument with a nude video.