>>/161529/
That's how this board works, and of course if (a big if) the girl is not of age, then it should be a matter for someone like the admin to handle. Alas, other girls' threads have had this problem before; even when they were underage, it seems to be due to a lack of moderation by the board staff, not the admin team, since they're separate but complementary in cases they need to be.

Value is relative; what you don't see as valuable can hold great value to others. Your posts show a pattern of trying to dismantle this thread as quickly as possible, using arguments that go against the logic established by the board owner and volunteers since the board's creation.
 >>/161586/
> No suggestive audio-visual content of underage children. Loli ok. 
She doesn't look like a child. I'd suggest that the admins make this rule more specific, as its broad wording creates loopholes.