>>/21006/
I think it's pretty simple: she likes the music. She's been vocal about how she thinks that artists being bad people doesn't mean you can't like their art. Most of her taste is industrial or related stuff. 
> the artist sometimes IS the performance and the counter-culture movement IS the art, as opposed to the end products being the art.
Clearly not the case with her relationship to this music. If you asked her what her thoughts are on what you copied and pasted from this article, I don't think she'd say anything short of how horrible it is. She also loves the music of Ariel Pink who is a confirmed abuser. 

The rest of your questions have already been covered here. She never took money from anyone, and she was under the impression that the people she was friends (The Russian, Marky, probably others from years ago too) with weren't using the site and were good people until she wound up betrayed or bamboozled by them. This speaks far more of her naivety and stupidity and (Former) lack of life experience than anything else. Keep in mind this is all from over 4 years ago. 

As for perfume, she sees it as an artform, which makes sense considering she makes it herself now and has friends with careers in perfumery. The skincare is just vanity imo, I've never seen her talk about that in any way except when she was asked on instagram q&as.

> talking about sexual themes in a less-than-sacred way
Weird expectation to have of anyone, even for her. I know she has cares about love being this transcendental thing, but that doesn't mean she doesn't have a sex drive like the rest of us either, plus all scandalous things can still be enjoyed in the context of love. The erotic blurbs in her perfume writing aren't contradictory at all. To my knowledge she's been trying to overcome some of her obsessive tendencies with all of this anyway, not that she ever went into detail about it. She never wrote about any of this in depth, only made vague allusions that people tried to fill in the gaps of, so much of what anons say regarding her values is just hearsay and assumptions, followed by breakdowns when she doesn't meet their made-up image of her in their heads. I have never understood this side of orbiting peresonally. Most of us are eager to say she's for or against this and that, not because of anything she's actually said, but because of what anons have said over the years that gets passed on as common knowledge lore. I think that's important to keep in mind, most of what seems like cognitive dissonance was never something she's even spoken about at all.