>>/21980/
i would prefer not to be identified at all. the truth i am referring to is actually ken-related, but is about the sam hyde/marky situation. i saw that something happened on sam's fish tank show recently that had people throwing a lot of marky stuff at the show's live text-to-speech donation system, so i came back to this board, saw that post near the top of this thread and reacted to it.

let's say i am in an old screen shot - would my interest in this matter even be capable of revealing any such "significant" truth (that sam hyde penis'd a child) to the public? only then would i be compelled to share, and now, knowing that i have been burned before, i would only do so given counsel with whomever leaked such juicy (hypothetical) screenies in the first place, but i highly doubt that person posts here at all. if they do, i'd be surprised. that's all i'm willing to say on the matter.