>>/76565/
> i dont see the point in entertaining this conversation.
if you think I and others are
> normaliz[ing] grooming
and want that to stop, I would think you would have some interest in proving your point. her age at this point is still unproven as well as the grooming question. I don't think I'm infallible by any means and would hope that I don't groom someone, but mocking someone about their persona in their absence is not grooming. if she has been grooming into posting some of the relevant photos and videos, you might have an argument of normalizing grooming in some capacity, but again that's just conjecture at this point.