a random agatha2 banner

/agatha2/ - E-Girl Purgatory

e-girl gossip & drama


New Reply on thread #7132
X
Max 20 files0 B total
[New Reply]

[Index] [Catalog] [Banners] [Logs]
Posting mode: Reply [Return]


thumbnail of tumblr_ae05e77904ffe2d2c9ec1870b8268bd3_ebf9932f_500.jpg
thumbnail of tumblr_ae05e77904ffe2d2c9ec1870b8268bd3_ebf9932f_500.jpg
tumblr_ae05e77904f... jpg
(45.23 KB, 500x556)
Commie Ken stopped using social media half a year ago, but still uses RYM and Letterboxd. She also writes perfume reviews that involve philosophy. She is 5'3 and her shoe size is a 6 in women's and 4 in men's. 

https://rateyourmusic.com/~lovesick
https://letterboxd.com/heartbeat/
https://www.fragrantica.com/member/1299311/ 
https://lovesickloveletters.blogspot.com/
 >>/7132/
Based height shoe size anon, thanks for the new thread.
Asking right now, has anyone gone through with reverse google image searching every single Ken pic that's available? I imagine that rabbit hole might lead to some interesting discoveries.

Also, post feet.
 >>/7135/
> reverse google image searching every single Ken pic
I've done that a few times and it's not as interesting as you'd suspect. The weirdest thing is stumbling across some Finnish and Russian image boards of people wondering who she is or drawing her. The worst are those Voxed/Rouzed threads which you now have to have a Latin/South American IP to view. Its like if you took every worst aspect of r9k and distilled it and made it fifty times more annoying and stupid.
 >>/7139/
Interesting. What about using other reverse image services, like tineye? Or reverse image searching those new images you found, like the drawings?
Also, it's worth mentioning that you might be able to use a VPN or proxy to bypass that IP requirement.
 >>/7140/
I used a VPN to bypass it once out of curiosity. Not even worth it. Like I said, probably the worst userbase of any site I can think of. They make it really easy to spot them here too. 
I haven't used tinyeye or anything like that. I tried reverse image searching the drawings once and got nothing, including that drawfag's pic from a thread or two ago. I've searched her blog extensively for keywords but never got anything new or out of the ordinary either. 

I will say though, I found out a few weird things on her family while digging, but it's nothing scandalous. I can confirm what another anon mentioned about her cousin killing himself when they were both 16, and I found some documents on her father being insane that I don't really want to post.
 >>/7142/
Hmmmm, then all I can think of is using another search engine, like bing or duckduckgo. Maybe combing through the various 4ch---an archive websites, but that's about it. Guess we'll have to wait for new developments from her. She'll post something new eventually, even if it takes a long time.
Good on you for not posting the private info. It's best to respect their privacy, if the info isnt the "juicy" kind. Its also good to keep it away from malicious people.
 >>/7143/
Lol believe it or not I can't find it anymore. Looks like it's been scrubbed in the past year or two. It was documentation that her dad had been jailed for domestic abuse and assault a few times. I couldn't 100% confirm it was her dad but everything added up. 
I feel bad for her and to repeat what some other anons already said, I dont know how she turned out okay. It makes sense that her cousin killed himself given what (limited info) I know about her family history. I am not calling her some sort of untouchable angel but its hard to not pity her.
 >>/7144/
The problem with those archives is that a lot, if not most, of what gets posted there is made up. Same goes for here when certain posters are out of hibernation lmao, but it's easy to tell the schizos apart. My best bet is that she's just busy with friends and traveling and still doing the same usual things.
 >>/7145/
If it's been scrubbed, it's possible that it still exists on archival websites, like the wayback machine.
Unfortunately, I dont think she ended up okay at all. She has multiple red flags, not to mention that any woman who ends up here is probably not mentally well lol.
 >>/7148/
She seems happy and stable though. Definitely not fully normal because shes stuck with autism and OCD for life, but she has friends and a normal boyfriend now, goes out regularly, and has no record of hurting anyone or herself. She never shilled herself and has always been lowkey and stayed out of things. I feel bad even posting here because she just wants to be left alone but something keeps bringing me back.
 >>/7150/
I dont understand why, but I'm fascinated by these ewhores, not even in a simping way. I guess the psychology of how they act is interesting.
when will you people accept that she’s never taken nudes? the closest you’ll get to that is by hacking her icloud and finding all the pics she’s ever taken.
 >>/7132/
> Rat face
> she dresses as a retard
> giant nose
> dark eyes
> communist
> Thread #4

I don't understand, how does she do it??
I think ken is deeply aware of her appeal, she just acts like she doesn’t because girls who aren’t aware of how attractive they are are more attractive. she’s like “my life is boring and I’m nothing special stop idealizing me” and meanwhile emulated her social media presence to make herself look at quirky as possible
 >>/7174/
Well, she stopped posting so there's no new stuff to even judge. But idk I think in reality she's just autistic as a mother fucker. She's had more or less the same few interests and behaviors for years and years. The most new thing is the perfume obsession which she's head over heels for. She doesn't think she's weird because she's so used to herself and her interests. Even her friends have the same interests as her so she has no reason to think she's weird.
 >>/7174/
just gonna go out on a limb and say she definitely has self esteem issues on top of everything else. idk if she still is,but she was anorexic for years after her cousin died and talked about fasting a lot. she framed it as being about health and asceticism but its obvious there was more to it. i think she wants to feel attractive though
 >>/7164/
It's a woman who's had chad boyfriends in he past. There is a 100% chance that she's sent him nudes, or at the absolute least, has taken some to see if they're good enough to send him. The only question is whether those end up being publicly accessible or not.
Remember, women will do anything for a chad, regardless of what you think her "morals" or "personality" is like.
 >>/7174/
You're absolutely right. I'd also argue that not only is it a strategy to make herself more appealing, but it's also a way to rationalize and convince herself that she's totally not fishing for attention, and that she's totally not getting off on the praise she gets.
Like the other anon said, she likely has self esteem issues, but in reality, that just makes her get off even MORE on the attention.
 >>/7188/
Yeah but this is a tiny obscure subforum. You gotta look at the praise she gets on her own media, stuff like instagram, tumblr, etc. Even her blog or something. Not to mention any attention she gets irl.
 >>/7156/
I didn't mean to say it is an intentional self-parody. she put together relatively trivial stuff, LOVE (of all things), and revolutionary stands as if they were all a matter of personal taste.
> I like tuna sandwiches, pastel colors, gummy worms, bondage... oh yeah, aand dictatorship of the proletariat
kek & wtf
I'm more and more convinced that she's a poser who believes her own bs, but don't get mad at me kenbros, it's just my opinion.
 >>/7194/
You're reading too much into it. It's some thrifting app, and she never publicized the account. The oldest purchases go back to 2015 I think so like I already said earlier, it was probably written years ago and she didn't think anyone was reading it anyway. It's really gay but I couldn't see her writing that now, honestly. You should've seen some of her old tumblr posts before she deleted them. I wish I had screencaps. Lots of cringe from when she was 15-16
What are her health issues? Didn’t she end up having to go to the doctor/hospital many times? I think she mentioned in in some of her tumblr posts. I remember some anon said she had cancer
it's all very artsy-hipster-existential-intellectual-engagé yadda yadda yadda, but it's still good stuff.
you can tell she can't really go beyond the hip a e s t h e t i c because she didn't get Tarkovsky, who's beyond any kind of stylish bullshit, but maybe she will grow
 >>/7233/
not Nostalghia, though. ok, I'll admit it's not his best movie and kind of a slog to get through, but 5/10? ffs. there are no such thing as a poor Tarkovsky movie, and even Nostalghia has moments of sheer genius in it. has she rated anything else by him?
 >>/7235/
If it makes you feel any better I assume she uses the same rating method as she has on RYM. A 5/10 is considered good on her RYM because she's so particular with higher ratings. There's a name for it but I forget
looks like she hasn't seen Solaris, I think she might like it a lot. put it in your watch list, Ken, trust me! :3
 >>/7239/
I was thinking the same thing. I'm kind of baffled by how no one mentions her struggling with religion. She talked about her anxiety about it so openly in the past and it's obvious it's still weighing on her in that blog post she wrote. She seems torn between wanting to be religious and wanting to reject it altogether in pursuit of some higher worship of God in a more philosophical sense, idk, I haven't studied it much but that's the best I can word it.
 >>/7241/
...but I guess it's just not as interesting or cute as e-girl tradwife larping like Tahlia. It's probably the darkest thing about Ken. Or at least the darkest she's open about. She seems to have gotten better in the past year though. The blog post seems to directly imply that (I was shocked by how frank it was) and she stopped posting about the "scrupulosity" stuff as much.
 >>/7242/
Tahlia's and Kennedi's sense of religion is similar in some respects, though. they're both maladjusted and they both feel inadequate. religion to them represents the ideal of purity and perfection they strive for, but it helps feeding their guilt at the same time. the difference between them is that Ken's issues are more intimate and have much more to do with morals, whereas Tahlia was more preoccupied with the social aspect of it. she didn't care about being good as much as she wanted to be appreciated and live in a pristine environment where she would have felt safe. Tahlia was also less intelligent and well-read, and way more delusional, probably because she was brought up in a backwards environment and all her life revolved around a perfectly sealed echo chamber inhabited by /pol/ idiots. Ken, on the other hand, seems genuinely idealistic. she seems to aspire to some sort of liberating transcendence where all impurities are consumed to be replaced by a newly found harmony, devoid of any asperity and conflict. she's kind of into saints, martyrs and mysticism, isn't she? her idea of love is part of this fusional fantasy and communism is just a secular version of it. these ideals are distinctive of a sensitive person, but they're also quite dangerous, since they're very unrealistic. a person who feels like this is bound to have their expectations regularly frustrated by reality. this might have something to do with autism as well. I know that Agatha used to have obsessive religious thoughts and severe ocd when she was a child. autistic people tend to see the world in black and white, and christianity is very well suited to such a worldview. they can't cope with people's complexity, with their motives and contradictions, and they can't put themselves in other people's shoes so, if they're particularly idealistic, they might be prone to judging others (and themselves) by abstract standards and being rather sanctimonious. I’m obviously just psychonalyzing her and I’m not even that knowledgeable about her to sure of what I’m saying. it would be much more interesting to hear what she has to say about it.
 >>/7246/
You, sir, I think understand Ken better than anyone on these boards.
> her idea of love is part of this fusional fantasy and communism is just a secular version of it
This in particular is just totally nail on the head. And it definitely explains her views on romantic love too and certain things she's done and said. 
I do find it important that Ken has never called herself a Christian. I think part of her she wishes she could be one but knows she can't ever be anything of the sort because she is too aware of how flawed human beings are, but wants to believe in some sort of transcendental goodness anyway, even though she knows no one can attain it. Her blogpost was about mistranslations of the bible and how inaccurate all the various translations can be, but there was an overtone of disapproval of Christian puritanism. Caught between Spinoza and Simone Weil kek. Poor girl
 >>/7247/
 >>/7246/
From her blog post:
> White florals occupy a peculiar space in folklore. At first glance they seem to be flowers of contradiction, embodying innocence and purity while simultaneously notorious for their heady, seductive powers; but these are two sides of the same coin. 
> the longing for a place of uncontaminated innocence and unconditional love and the inevitable and controversial burden of life.
> Savage animalia meets petal-white innocence in an ode to that endless tightrope act, striving to balance an aching, ashamed hunger for repentance with the curiosity and acceptance of flaws innate to the human condition.
> made up of feelings of sin and guilt – real, or even worse, imaginary.
> The double nature of any human being: longing to perfection, innocence, absence of mistake, to a place uncontaminated by sin from one side, and the inevitable fallibility and impossibility of amending mistakes.
> White flowers continue to be a powerful badge of purity, not despite the now-repressed eroticism of the Bible but in part because of it. However frequently misguided, attempts at forming spiritual allegories are not entirely in vain. The eroticism in Song of Songs does not negate the holiness of its love but rather reinforce it, leaving plenty of room for allegories on soul unions with both God and a lover, and space for lilies to flourish as concurrently pure and sensual, for all who live in love live in God and God lives in them.
> Beyond vulgar interpretations of the word based on the myth of being physically sullied, the Christian conception of purity remains a largely unattainable metaphysical state to continuously strive for against all odds; but in an alternate sense of the word, purity permeates all actions born out of love and grace. To be able to even attempt to live and love in the name of goodness remains a holy gift regardless of formalities and external factors. 
> To live is to contradict and see-saw, and acceptance of this is not embracing any semblance of "impurity," but rather relishing life itself as a dialectical experience, learning through action and coming to terms with not only ourselves, but morality, love, death, sensuality, resentment, ecstasy, and transgression.
 >>/7247/
 >>/7248/
from what she writes, I think she might be on the right path if she manages to get rid of all the dichotomy between good and evil and of dialectical thinking altogether, since it looks like she's still very anchored to it, despite her efforts. then, quoting Artaud, she might be able to have done with the judgment of god.
 >>/7174/
 >>/7186/
if there's one thing the internet has succeeded in doing, it's calculating the value/popularity/appeal of everything and beaming it back out. people are no different from homes or rare records in this regard, and ken, with her brain marinated in semiotexte pdfs, is deeply aware of this
thumbnail of tumblr_c02cf3598c19b7967e2e1c7c009ee7b6_da296124_500.png
thumbnail of tumblr_c02cf3598c19b7967e2e1c7c009ee7b6_da296124_500.png
tumblr_c02cf3598c19b7... png
(22.17 KB, 456x102)
thumbnail of tumblr_70e0d0693adae5b132e7f680a47598ba_0b6c61ce_500.png
thumbnail of tumblr_70e0d0693adae5b132e7f680a47598ba_0b6c61ce_500.png
tumblr_70e0d0693adae5... png
(46.94 KB, 455x199)
thumbnail of tumblr_f87fa2a6834f3f06ac3e349bebdf4a5c_92cd7654_500.png
thumbnail of tumblr_f87fa2a6834f3f06ac3e349bebdf4a5c_92cd7654_500.png
tumblr_f87fa2a6834f3f... png
(69.42 KB, 462x314)
 >>/7253/
one of her favorite books is about that. she made some posts about it but said it was inescapable and "everyone is in bed with capital" whether they think they are or not. i think her leaving the internet almost entirely was the logical conclusion to all her reading and writing about this. i dont think shes ever coming back because its obvious she realized how complicit she was in what she hated. her letterboxd and rym will probably be deleted soon, mark my words
 >>/7260/
tried finding it but someone said the same thing to her on tumblr through the ask box a couple years back and she wrote some long response about how shes not actually that intelligent, and anyone could learn the things she learns about if they took time to, and that high functioning autism doesnt make anyone smart and is just some social category. she wasnt actually made but she was obviously upset that someone would think autism means youre smart
 >>/7258/
autism means you cannot function as expected on a social level, you have sensory issues, you have difficulty communicating your inner self as well as understanding other people thoughts, feelings and behaviors, and countless other inconveniences depending on your particular situation. it has nothing to do with being supersmart, stop watching fucking Rain Man
 >>/7255/
I'd have to object a few things to what she's saying in a slightly delirious way (or at least it sounds delirious taken out of context) but who cares.
is she referring to herself when she talks about this archetypal Young-Girl?
if you want to disengage from capitalism you'll have to do more than leaving the internet. you'd have to entirely get off the grid, isolate yourself from society and live in a hut or something, and even then you would have a very hard time surviving for a long period of time, no matter how self-sufficient you can be.
> everyone is in bed with capital
interesting sexual language btw
 >>/7314/
She didn't write those pics, and she doesn't think she's disengaging from capitalism by deleting her socials. She wanted to stop feeling like a commodity like the pics describe. 
Like  >>/7253/ said, social media and the internet in general made this problem a billion times worse. 
I haven't read the book myself because it's a little confusing but it's called Preliminary Materials for a Theory of the Young Girl by Tiqqun. It's basically a scathing critique of how people (they claim the young girl archetype applies to men too) treat themselves like commodities under capitalism and how everyone falls into this even if they try not to. I think she must have realized how complicit she was in this and finally decided an internet presence wasn't worth it anymore, and how posting selfies fueled us talking about her more.
 >>/7316/
I'm glad she realized what her position was, that's what I was aiming at when I talked about her contradictions. I'm quite familiar with the concepts you mentioned, but I didn't know that particular book. I'll check it out, thanks.
 >>/7248/
 >>/7255/
It rather annoys me when people write a long piece of text without actually saying much. Why cant people just make their points succinctly? I get that it's a book or blogpost, so part of the point is the flowery language, but it just seems so inefficient, to the point where it comes across as pretentious.
Am I a dumb retard or a cynical smartass?
 >>/7316/
> people (...) treat themselves like commodities under capitalism and how everyone falls into this
Is the implication here that, without capitalism, people wouldnt do that? Cause I'm pretty sure human narcissism and human hierarchies completely transcend any economical system.
It seems analogous to when people hate the X\10 attractiveness scale, as if not using it makes it so you cant ever gauge someone's attractiveness.
 >>/7255/
So that first pic is saying that the only times women are praised, is when they act like servants\slaves? (I assume this is referring to housewives supporting their husbands)
 >>/7324/
Wrong and wrong. It's saying that feminization isn't good because to be feminine almost always implies some sort of subservience. It's not in that post but it goes on to ridicule women who say "I'm gonna do whatever I want with my hair!" As if the "freedom" to make that choice is actual freedom.
 >>/7321/
the pretentiousness is the point. it’s the veneer that allows readers to wallow in their own misery. wiki rundowns don’t cut it when revolutionary activity is reduced to collapsing on your fainting couch
 >>/7321/
> Am I a dumb retard or a cynical smartass?
the former.
it's not that the text is not saying much, it's that you're not getting anything out of it, which is quite different. philosophy, like literature, is about what you say just as much as how you say it. in order to work, complex thoughts have to be conveyed in a very specific way, and the more complex they are, the more they need to unfold through long sentences, paragraphs and several logically connected points. a poem is not its paraphrase and a book its not its summary, they're only equal to themselves. it's banal, but it looks like it has to be pointed out.
yes, sometimes intellectuals are just being pretentious, and French theory has produced a remarkable quantity of pompous epigones, but that's not often the case when we're talking about important thinkers. more often than not, if you get the impression that a text is gratuitously convoluted, probably it's not because the author is being pretentious, but because you're being shallow, you're not making any effort, you don't know enough about the subject or all these things at once. if you lack humility and add presumption on top of that, it easily leads to banalization and misunderstanding, as you have shown in your subsequent post (or in your tirades about communism, because I'm pretty sure you're the same wise guy).

p.s. none of what I've written is unnecessary or redundant, all was essential to make my point properly.
thumbnail of 1636694814794.png
thumbnail of 1636694814794.png
1636694814794 png
(256.01 KB, 479x473)
So what do you think Ken's type is? I think it's something like
> longish hair
> tall
> chiseled jaw
> longer face
> academic
> into music and art
> dark brooding romantic
Picrel is the closest she's ever gotten to talking about what she's attracted to. I think she said she wouldn't date a capitalist too.
 >>/7360/
Are you Ken or someone who knows her? I think I've asked you this before and you said you had no interest in talking to her but that's hard to believe.
 >>/7360/
> complex thoughts have to be conveyed in a very specific way, and the more complex they are, the more they need to unfold through long sentences
I respectfully disagree. Just like how this quote is the main point of your post, even very complex ideas can be explained succinctly. Do you know of any specific concepts that absolutely need to be long winded to be explained properly? If so, please enlighten me, cause I cant think of any.
> your subsequent post (or in your tirades about communism, because I'm pretty sure you're the same wise guy).
Correct. Im also the guy who dunks on women. Are you the guy who wrote a lot about communism in the previous thread?
> p.s. none of what I've written is unnecessary or redundant
Ya got me, I was thinking the same thing before seeing the PS.
 >>/7361/
I'm gonna take a wild guess and say her type is tall, handsome, buff, rich, confident, popular. Just like 99% of women.
On a side note, notice the solipsism of her sentence. She likes that kind of guy, so every guy should look like that.
 >>/7365/
she's the only girl on here that I find interesting to some extent, but that doesn't mean that I know her personally or that I've got any way of getting in touch with her.
thumbnail of fidel personality detector malfunction.jpg
thumbnail of fidel personality detector malfunction.jpg
fidel... jpg
(72.66 KB, 812x960)
 >>/7361/
> she wouldn't date a capitalist
I want to point out how women often say stuff like this, but they will instantly drop panties for a hot "capitalist" (most people just call that "normal"). Women create rules for betas, and break them for chads. Just like how women tell betas that they only go to a bar\club to "dance with their friends", but in reality they're looking for men to bang, just not betas. Or how they say they dont like being asked out in public, "dont bother women", etc.. But they're extremely receptive to a chad's advances.
I could be misremembering, but wasnt ken the egirl that had that pic of her grabbing onto that chad looking guy? I have a feeling that guy's not exactly a communist.
Point being, never underestimate the shit women will do for chad.
 >>/7366/
> Do you know of any specific concepts that absolutely need to be long winded to be explained properly? If so, please enlighten me
with pleasure. Heidegger's ontology, Marx's theory of value, Husserl's theory of perception. these are just three off the top of my head, but it doesn't necessarily have to be philosophy.
> Im also the guy who dunks on women
that explains a lot
> Are you the guy who wrote a lot about communism
you got me
 >>/7367/
> notice the solipsism
of course she's solipsistic, that's literally what autism is
> the chad was a capitalistic pig
according to Wikipedia, John Maus places himself left of left of left of left in the political spectrum

you see? you keep embarrassing yourself
 >>/7373/
> autism solipsism
I imagine there are multiple types of autism, and not all are solipsistic, not that it would be an excuse for it in the first place. Also being autistic still doesnt make being solipsistic right.
Also  >>/7374/ is for you too.
Though my point was more that women will sacrifice their ideals for chads. It's just that with this guy it wasnt the case, this time.
 >>/7380/
Is she truly? Either you're too naive or I'm too cynical. Even if she's being cheeky, I smell a kernel of sincerity in her words. I've seen many many women being genuinely resentful (daresay hateful) of men who dont fit their specific preferences in men. (and this is separately from their resentment of "not hot" men)

Also, the autism question is rather redundant in a forum dedicated to orbiting egirls.
> guy who has spammed every thread with his manifestos on every single woman being an soulless evil succubus waiting for chad cock is wondering if he's too cynical 
it's like poetry... it brings a tear to my eye
 >>/7386/
Fool. All that matters is whether I'm objectively right or wrong about a topic.
The only reason why I'm contemplating my cynicism is because I desperately want to be wrong. I desperately want my hypotheses regarding the world (women included) to be wrong.
I dont want to think badly of women, but every day I see them be dramatic, manipulative, narcissistic, egotistical, etc. and I dont see them express good qualities. And I cant be delusional about this shit. I cant see their shit behavior and just ignore it.
There was a really good greentext that explained this, but I seem to have misplaced the pic. The point is that this shit is what I'm objectively seeing, and I wish it wasnt the truth.
 >>/7370/
Gonna be honest, I was expecting you to mention some concepts I was already familiar with, but I'll happily do some research.
> Husserl's theory of perception
> there's a distinction between "natural" and "phenomenological" modes of understanding
> natural understanding consists of the objective reality that can be perceived via senses, which includes the possibility of those senses being inaccurate
> phenomenological understanding consists of each individual's own subjective perception, without any objectivity from the real world
Kinda like the "your red is not my red" thing. Rather interesting topic.
So, be honest, how far off am I?
 >>/7391/
nononono, you asked me to mention complicated stuff, I did, and that's it. if you expect me to start *discussing* that complicated stuff at length on endchan, I think you should reconsider your convictions about my priorities in life, because you're way off the mark. that doesn't mean that I don't appreciate you doing some research, though. I give you credit for that, bravo.
 >>/7375/
I'd like to clarify that, since it's simpler than discussing phenomenology. autists can be very different from one another, but solipsism can be considered a fundamental trait, if not the fundamental trait. in fact, autism can be understood as a psychological solipsism. autism comes from the greek word 'autos', which means 'self'. an autistic person's mind tends to be very self-contained, even more so in the so-called "low functioning" part of the spectrum.
that said, ken was obviously being cheeky in her post. I reckon you see evil where there isn't and you magnify minor things in order to confirm your own bias towards women. mind you, I'm not saying that women are particularly good either. they're just like anybody else, which is to say that they suck, because most people suck.
 >>/7428/
No dude, I wasnt asking you to discuss the topic with me. I was asking you if the condensed summary that I wrote is a good and correct explanation of the whole theory.
If it indeed is, then it proves that complex topics can be summarized effectively without losing pertinent info.
 >>/7465/
No, yeah, you're right, Kennedi is known to be a huge fan of the Montreal Canadiens and the Fallout series of video games
 >>/7467/
Kek'd
Also her hair is lighter, longer, her hips are more wide, she's never been in a room like that. The person in that pic is a really obvious tranny with the kawaii emote face mask to match. 
Swear to God some of you are blind when it comes to matching people to pics. Especially the rouzed spics.
 >>/7434/
> I was asking you if the condensed summary that I wrote is a good and correct explanation of the whole theory
it isn't. now you have your answer.
 >>/7461/
 >>/7462/
I hope the phase where she takes selfies hiding her face is over. I used to know other girls who did that and it was like end-stage vanity, so I find it quite annoying
 >>/7476/
Honestly it's so pathetic. She's perfectly fine fishing for attention with pics of her body, but when it comes to her face, she's painfully insecure. It's genuinely fascinating how someone can be so public with one part of their body, but so private with another.
As the song goes, "conceited with no self esteem".
thumbnail of why put yourself in the pic if youre gonna hide yourself.jpg
thumbnail of why put yourself in the pic if youre gonna hide yourself.jpg
why put... jpg
(172.81 KB, 1080x1350)
thumbnail of a.jpg
thumbnail of a.jpg
a jpg
(114.73 KB, 1080x1350)
thumbnail of aa.jpg
thumbnail of aa.jpg
aa jpg
(340.28 KB, 1650x2048)
 >>/7485/
Dont be naive, you're just trying to blindly defend anything she does.
It isnt exclusive to her or other women in her situation. Chicks on facebook or instgram do this shit all the time. Pics related.
 >>/7477/
This isn't true though. All we've seen of her body are her thighs a few times basically. She almost never wears form fitting clothes, but seemed to start wearing more of them before she deleted. She has plenty of pics with her face.
 >>/7490/
Also all the pics of face hiding were on her story which expired after a single day. She used her stoty to show her outfits.
 >>/7487/
maybe she's not comfortable with putting it out there (again: this board, the nazi spiquisition, the scorned lover who showed up to her house armed with a handgun, etc -- are you completely unable to imagine yourself in her position?). maybe she thinks she's butt fucking ugly. in any case, not everything is some grand conspiracy to deprive an entitled party (yes, you) of fresh pics

> how someone can be so public with one part of their body
she's just posting her shitty 60s librarian outfits, basically doing what millions of people are doing every day. apart from the first image in  >>/7460/ she has never put up anything even remotely revealing. if she's 'fishing for attention', then she's doing it in the most innocuous way possible; that is, if her manner of social media use is 'pathetic and conceited' then my man you'll be frothing at the mouth and ready for the loony bin when you learn about every other single female currently in existence

you're the same faggot who has effectively taken over this entire thread with room temp iq takes to work out his issues with politics and women, aren't you?
 >>/7497/
the second and third picture on  >>/7462/ have nothing to do with outfits, though. I think it's obvious enough that she was doing it because it's a fashionable thing to do, like putting a shoe on your head or that kind of crap. it's nothing serious, though, I didn't mean to start an international incident, I was just stating my taste. I don't like contrived shyness, that's all, although I should have imagined that anything is enough to trigger a witch hunt here. my bad. also, I'd like to point out that, although I wrote  >>/7476/, I didn't wrote  >>/7477/. I wouldn't dream of something so pathetic as quoting an incel anthem.
 >>/7501/
I just mean any perceived shyness from her is definitely not contrived. The plant and bread thing is just some attempt at being cute and artsy I think which could be contrived depending on how seriously you read into that. The plant pic isn't a selfie though, it's a candid.
 >>/7502/
I don't think there's anything artsy in putting things over your face, but it is indeed an attempt at being cute. that cuteness, though, derives precisely by an expression of shyness and insecurity which one is supposed to find cute and endearing. since this cute, endearing shyness is expressed by means of a fashionable gesture repeated and imitated by countless girls on the internet, it's a replica, a copy, a reproduction, which is the opposite of a sponeaneous, strictly personal gesture. as such, it can only be contrived, regardless of whether it's performed for a selfie or a candid. now, if you want we can keep nitpicking until the end of the world, but if you indulge in pedantry a little longer I might begin to think that you're autistic as well (and if you are, well, there you go).
 >>/7502/
Im not the guy youre replyng to.
> shyness 
I take issue with this term. People who post many pics of themselves publicly online are not "shy". Genuinely shy people avoid the spotlight. She's just someone who wants attention\praise but is insecure about her looks, that's it.
thumbnail of palm on cheek compilation.png
thumbnail of palm on cheek compilation.png
palm on cheek... png
(1.06 MB, 1085x1026)
 >>/7504/
> this cute, endearing shyness is expressed by means of a fashionable gesture repeated and imitated by countless girls on the internet, it's a replica, a copy, a reproduction, which is the opposite of a sponeaneous, strictly personal gesture. as such, it can only be contrived
Im not the guy youre replying to, but that was very well put.
I've noticed a lo of women do this "contrived shyness" thing a lot. One big example is the "palm on cheek" thing, or doing a kissy face, or sticking their tongue out. It's just completely fake and manipulative, without any ounce of sincerity or honesty.
 >>/7514/
it's just conformism, really. people like imitating, and it's no surprise, since they share 98.8% of their lousy genes with apes. they also like to throw shit at one another, as you can see on this board.
thumbnail of c9751c4040f492715b1d6ab3390af133.jpg
thumbnail of c9751c4040f492715b1d6ab3390af133.jpg
c9751c4040f49... jpg
(18.7 KB, 300x402)
There are photos of Ken on rouzed that haven't been posted here yet. To those with full access to the site - let's get them all over here.

The attached image exists at a higher resolution.
 >>/8126/
It makes me think "Haha, women only want chads, even if she's extremely insecure and self-conscious.". Also about hypergamy.
 >>/8395/
its a good song because you know the guy singing it is the exact person hes making fun of. all artists are like this even if they dont admit to it. take it or leave it desu
 >>/8402/
yeah. apparently it's a drawing of judith killing holofernes which is an apocryphal thing from the bible. im not sure what the hebrew says. shes not jewish but she's taken a liking to analyzing bible translations
 >>/8410/
if the drawing in the background is hers then it's a Schiele ripoff and, as for Judith and Holofernes, it's kind of a cliché as feminist iconography. I think this might be enough for a pretentious critique
 >>/8432/
She logs the most obscure shit with less than 500 views. She tries so hard to be unique and special. Well, if she's trying to seduce incels like me with that, let me tell you, she's succeeding
thumbnail of 1601242966773.jpg
thumbnail of 1601242966773.jpg
1601242966773 jpg
(123.83 KB, 1080x1129)
> that simp urge to use a Kennedi pic as my phone screen, Twitter and Facebook covers
> that urge to print out her photos and glue them on my all
 >>/8496/
i guess i get what you mean but idk. she got hot in the past few years but seeing her as a teenager just makes me feel sad and weird. she looked unhealthy mentally and physically. especially when trying to use makeup
thumbnail of kennedi love incest.png
thumbnail of kennedi love incest.png
kennedi love incest png
(9.61 KB, 956x67)
Kennedi rated a movie called "The Color Wheel." 4 stars our of 5. She also "hearted" which she only does to films she really enjoys.

The weird thing about this movie is it's about an incestuous relationship between a brother and his sister. They literally fuck in the movie and there are multiple sexual scenes.

This makes me think of how strongly kennedi felt about her cousins death back in 2016. It's all over her tumblr, it seems weird how she was so close with a boy cousin of hers, he ended committing suicide. Kennedi was grieving in a strange way as if she loved him more than a family member. If you guys want to see just scroll through her tumblr and go to her post from 2016 to early 2017. This is all just a theory though. I do find it strange she rated a film about incest this high though. It wasn't even a good movie.
 >>/8556/
> It wasn't even a good movie.
> implying you watched it right after she did just because she liked it

dude, get yourself some dignity
 >>/8560/
I'm sorry then, giving in to that assumption was too tempting.
I like movies myself and I've heard about that one, although I haven't watched it. I don't think I will either, since you say it's no good. I've probably already seen better movies about incest anyway.
 >>/8556/
btw, I think you might be reading too much into it. I got the idea that kennedi tends to value obscurity and style over actual quality, both in cinema and music. or maybe she just has some incest fetish and, against all odds, she spends her days on ph watching videos like 'big brother, promise you won't tell mommy I let you cum inside me'. we might never know
 >>/8556/
she also highly rates films about suicide, infidelity, and christianity. she isnt suicidal, isnt fond of infidelity, and isnt christian. it doesnt mean anything. she doesnt have an incest fetish and in some of her criticisms of the porn industry she calls out the fetishization of family. 
the color wheel is mumblecore which she just really likes in general. and she has a few other films of the same genre rated highly (the puffy chair and funny ha ha and computer chess). 

 >>/8560/
> i watched it before her actually, im a film buff and part time critic kek
lmao
 >>/8556/
also its weird to make it about her dead cousin. according to her they were best friends and only had each other for most of their lives. assuming this is sexual is more a reflection of your own perversions than hers
 >>/8556/
broken english, sexual conspiracy theories, bringing up her cousin. yep it's the nazi
btw she even has movies about trannies in her "like" list even though shes a terf. 

 >>/8564/
> I got the idea that kennedi tends to value obscurity and style over actual quality
i thought this at first a few years ago too until i realized there are patterns to it. she loves any music with strong synths and drum machines. loves any film about sad love, and a lot of her favorite movies are people having slow conversations about life and relationships. she likes whimsical things too. even that stupid hungarian cartoon she just gave 4.5 stars is about a ruined wedding 

 >>/8568/
if she was gonna find jesus she would have by now. i think shes too aware of bible history to be formally christian
 >>/8569/
very specific and idiosyncratic taste is quite common among auties, so it makes sense. she does show little appreciation or understanding for what significantly deviates from her preferences, though. as for christianity, I was exaggerating a bit, of course, but her idealism and strict moral values, nevermind the constant presence of religious imagery in her writings, clearly show some kind of strong religious trait in her personality, so I wouldn't be surprised if she was to find some kind of faith sooner or later, not in the slightest.
 >>/8569/
btw, can you point me to any source that proves she's a terf? I find it rather disappointing tbh, I didn't expect this kind of bigotry on her part, but maybe it has to do with her ideas about love, I don't know
 >>/8571/
she likes plenty of things but all her big favorites have a few shared themes for sure. big dialogues on love. political cynicism. fairytale shit. 
i dont think she'll become christian mostly because shes so into bible mistranslations and stuff. seems impossible to be christian while accepting that. her blog post was all about how song of songs is proof that interpretations of the bible are shit

 >>/8572/
no concrete proof other than her loving andrea dworkin and saying she thinks gender should be abolished instead of reinforced. and some stuff about male socialization
 >>/8569/
you sound fucking stupid. Half the people in this threads are ESLs. This guy brought up some very good points and said it was a theory. He didn't say it was true
 >>/8579/
there were no good points and it's a worthless theory. concluding she must likely have an incest fetish because her cousin died a tragic death is fucking stupid. even more stupid to suggest a hipster movie that has an incest scene is "proof" unless you think all the other movies she likes a lot are reflecting something about her. but spoiler alert, she's not a french man in a menage a trois on the brink of killing himself 

you have the mental capacity of a toddler if you think that someone liking a movie = someone condoning everything and relating to everything in the movie. using her cousin's violent suicide which obviously traumatized her given how close they were is fucking retarded too. maybe ken is right and porn is evil if this is the shit it's planting in your brain
 >>/8586/
But it does seem that all the movies she likes a lot do in fact reflect something about her. The preoccupation with suicide due to her cousins death, her obsession with the nature of love and by extension infidelity, and her struggles with her religious faith. Now it seems as though she has taken great interest in incest related films, so the question is why is that?
 >>/8591/
> it seems as though she has taken great interest in incest related films
it is literally ONE movie she liked, from a genre she already loves. it's not even a favorite movie. she gave it 4 stars. also in her 4 stars are a movie about fucking chess and a movie about cannabilism. 

but its pretty simple. she likes "human" movies with realistic acting that feels awkward and real. its mumblecore hipster bullshit. watch this and its identical to a few other movies she loves like the puffy chair, mutual appreciation, funny ha ha. all movies she rated way higher than the color wheel
now compare this clip of the color wheel https://youtube.com/watch?v=gOtO8JBtxpE[/youtube] to this clip of mutual appreciationyoutube]CBGLx1k2S08 [
it's the same exact shctick
 >>/8573/
biblical exgesis has nothing to do with faith. you keep conflating organized religion with spirituality. as for her being a terf, then you're making assumptions about her just like anyone else. you think they're right while others' are wrong just because they suit your own vision of who she's supposed to be. sorry, but ken herself would vehemently ferule you (and that would make slightly jealous).
 >>/8600/
This anon is right, her critiques of regnant biblical interpretations and organized religion itself do not mean that she is herself lacking in faith. There have been plenty of religious figures thought history who have done the same. I can not image that this would be one of her primary preoccuptions if she did not have at least some measure of faith.
thumbnail of ken contronts ex-friend who leaked info to spics?.png
thumbnail of ken contronts ex-friend who leaked info to spics?.png
ken contronts... png
(62.28 KB, 999x403)
Hey! Ora or whatever you're name is now! Stop "leaking" /ourgirl/s information to spics :) the /mu/ mods have had your IPs for over a year. All it would take is one single report to the FBI to get your door kicked ;)
Going to post more stuff after I eat. I will post stuff about Андрей/Desu soon.. O:

Get in here kenbros!
 >>/8653/
I'm not the schizo nazi at all. In fact I've never posted in this thread or any Ken related thread in about over year. However I will not claim Ken has done anything or make up theories based on nothing. I am just going to post screenshots that have NEVER been posted here or anywhere else before. At least anywhere that I know of. For example; the email convo/screenshots are 2 fresh ones.
 >>/8655/
hard to believe. you have the same writing style and you're clearly vindictive (you wouldnt be posting these if you didnt want to humiliate or scare her). there's also no way to know if any of these caps are altered. why did you take a year break and then randomly decide to come back with screenshots anyway?

also IDs won't help much i just rememebered the nazi liked to use VPNs to make himself seem like different posters. he failed anyway because he's so obvious
 >>/8657/
> writing style
kek I'm seriously not him. The reason I'm using a tripcode is to avoid people from LARPING as me. It's cool if you don't believe me but I will keep posting screenshots and eventually a mega w/ all the photos+screenshots later on.
 >>/8657/
the screenshots are always the same old. she has a deranged ex, she gets backstabbed by friends, she has male friends, her male friends want to fuck her but cant, shes neurotic, blah blah. whatever
and there arent tripcodes on this board. you just typed something into the namefield. youre definitely him and youre full of shit. 
you will never be white btw. take another english course
 >>/8653/
 >>/8655/
 >>/8659/

I don't give a shit. I hate drama and I despise people who feed on it, talk shit behind other people's back, impersonate others, in a couple of words: being dicks. it ruins everything. you can keep your screenshots and masturbate to them if you like.
 >>/8660/
 >>/8661/
I'm using a tripcode. There are tripcodes on this board you absolute baboon and I am white, eastern european to be exact, I am in no way or form a spic. 

You seem to either be Ken herself or someone who is deliberately trying to derail what I've posted because you think whiteknighting for Ken will maybe lead to some sort of "friendship" with her, which is hilarious. Anyhow, I'll keep posting photos and screenshots and no amount of coping will stop me.
 >>/8662/
yeah no one cares about this except him. eternally seething into the void and claiming he doesnt care about her despite having massive folders dedicated to her
 >>/8652/
The most interesting thing about this is that she's apparently friends with one of the 4chan mods and this mod is providing her with privileged information about users and their postings. This should really be reported to the 4chan moderation team and this person should be removed as mod.
the proof that, as I suspected, kennedi is a poser and a hipster: she rated Outer Space by Peter Tscherkassky one and a half stars. I mean, the nerve! she doesn't understand anything truly experimental and sophisticated that goes beyong that trite, verbose, pseudo-existential, sugary, french esthetic bullshit and his derivative, pretentious, even more watered-down, crappy american offspring. the same goes for her political stance, her posts about communism on her tumblr boil down to a naive, juvenile enthusiasm and are utterly out of touch with reality. how dare she not live up to my overblown expectations about her intelligence and refined taste? how can she remorselessly destroy an image she never asked to be made into? I'm honestly outraged. but wait, because it goes further than that. she added that very same experimental short film to her youtube playlist. why doing something like that, when she hated it so much? how is that supposed to make any sense? she's fucking with my mind, I tell you that.
thumbnail of 1574255337510.png
thumbnail of 1574255337510.png
1574255337510 png
(303.61 KB, 446x559)
 >>/8816/
Of course she's a poseur, she's just a 20something year old girl.
At least her pretention isn't as pompous and insufferable as yours. Her big, sloggish word salads sound silly, yours make you sound punchable. Get a grip man.
 >>/8816/
> NOOO THE PRETENTIOUS EGIRL DIDN'T LOVE A PRETENTIOUS MOVIE I LIKE 
Why do you care? I just watched the (very short) "movie" in question and it was boring. A flashing screen showing an afraid hysterics woman in motion. So deep!
 >>/8816/
Secondly, she adds whatever movie or clips she watches on YouTube into that Playlist it looks like, and based on her rym, 2 stars is actually a good score. 3 means she really likes it. 4 is love. 5 is all time favorite. Relax bro.
 >>/8821/
secondly, now that you, an ignoramus, have watched the film and decided that it's boring, a permanent verdict has been reached and the case can finally be dismissed after your scrupulous scrutiny. thank you for sacrificing yourself on the behalf of everybody else. too bad your judgment is horseshit because you don't know what you're talking about, still you're willing to post your worthless opinion like any other idiot on the internet.
there are quite a few much more interesting considerations that could be inspired by my exaggerated post, issues that go beyond kennedi, but people like you are so anxious about taking sides that they can't even detect a blatant provocation. I, on the other hand, can perfectly tell that you're the same twat that kept throwing up ignorance about communism not too long ago. you're the dipshit that calls other people pretentious while breezily passing judgment on each and every thing you have no clue about. that's the ultimate form of arrogance and pretentiousness, and judging by how much you indulge in it, you're beyond help. come on now, kid, post another fucking meme.
 >>/8870/
she didn't finish puberty until she was an adult. besides that, she started taking care of her skin, got a social life, got a job, stopped eating so little, and started dressing better. even just one of these things will do wonders for someone

it is crazy how much better she looks even while still not wearing makeup besides some lipstick every so often. the wonders of being healthy
 >>/8880/
not the same anon and not a woman either. maybe the first poster is but i doubt that too since he writes like a spic. don't be so paranoid. 

 >>/8879/
fair, my point is that she stopped being locked away inside and became a lot healthier, and it shows. getting a job was just part of that
 >>/8892/
she had a bf for a few years that didnt seem to be doing her much good. and now apparently she has a different one but no one has been able to tell exactly when or how she met him, who he is, what he looks like, etc. so i cant tell if he helped her or not. the most important thing was probably ending the relationship with her ex
new post 
https://lovesickloveletters.blogspot.com/2022/01/de-profundis-by-serge-lutens.html
i wonder why she didn't post about it on tumblr this time
 >>/8922/
how? it's very straight forward and most of this one was historical. i don't care about perfume or oscar wilde but it was an informative read

 >>/8921/
oh i didnt even see. but she gets too into flowery language and purple prose a lot of the time but other than that it's good. the long blog posts are way better than her fragrantica. i hope she keeps it up because i wonder how much better she'll get. plus they're fun even if idgaf about perfume
 >>/8923/
Agreed that her blogposts are better than her fragrantica reviews, but not by much. Her writing is too flowery and tries too hard to be deep and obscure. More girls are copying her writing style on fragrantica, as if her egirl stalkers couldn’t get any more pathetic
 >>/8924/
idk i dont think the blog post is trying hard to be obscure except the opening. the rest is just long and thoughtful. mostly her stating facts about things. the parts about suffering and death are nice too but she gets close to the fragrantica style. kind of want to read that oscar wilde letter now kek. 
also lmao people copy her fragrantica reviews?
 >>/8923/
The post is presented as an analysis of the perfume in the title, yet she keeps jumping from one disjointed topic to the other, from Oscar Wilde to all saints' day in France, Ophelia and a million other non sequiturs 
 united by nothing other than the insubstantial theme of chrysanthemum, which is just one of the ingredients of the perfume. All her cultural references are not cohesive and don't contribute to a deeper understanding of the perfume (or any other topic she presents), they're just aesthetic fluff. 
All I understood from that post is that she has a vast culture, she reads a lot about all kinds of topics but her studies lead her nowhere, she derives no insight from them.
 >>/8926/
they're connected though and she provided her own thoughts on everything while imo flowing nicely. it wasn't only chrysanthemum either, it was violets too and they are the main parts of the perfume according  to her. and she analyzed the significance of the name of the perfume and how it ties into the two flowers. the title is the name of the perfume but she took it further. mb im just a pleb though. not that i think shes a genius. it was simply a nice read
 >>/8921/
she tends to be unnecessarily flowery (pun intended), but I agree that the blog posts are better than her perfume review, at least they have substance and are not as impressionistic. on the other hand, they are rather long, and I don't really feel like reading them in their entirety. they're also a bit too drenched in factual knowledge for my taste. as the other anon said, the facts are also quite disjointed from one another, so the posts look like some long factual stream of consciousness, if that makes any sense.
it's clear that she's curious and likes to learn stuff, but I'd rather a blog post to be more centered around one's personal observations and thoughts, rather than looking like a collage of wikipedia articles.
nevertheless, I get the impression that she slips her feelings between the facts and conceals her experiences as in some sort of allegory. her fist post was clearly about her conflictual attitude towards sexuality, which she can't help but link to guilt. this seems to suggest that redemption and happiness can be achieved by experiencing and enduring pain. again, very religious themes.
I particularly liked the last part about Wilde, and how she connected the whole thing to an apparently trivial, but quite lovely personal anecdote, before ending with a quote that sounds like a recapitulation and a moral.
 >>/8940/
i cant see her using the blog as any kind of diary considering how private she is now. youre right about her lacing what she writes with personal anecdotes. gotta read between the lines. i have a feeling whatever she publishes is probably twice as long in a document
 >>/8943/
yes, I didn't mean 'personal' as in a diary, it's easy to see why she wouldn't want to talk about her private life and have nosy people like us meddling in it. maybe it wouldn't even be that interesting, at least to me. I was thinking of something less descriptive and including more of her own opinions and reflections on the same subjects. my own preferences aside, I'm still quite pleased to something written by her every now and then.
 >>/8960/
She was in the past. I think she views her traumas as having helped her become who she is and she feels happier and more appreciative because of it. Kind of a cope, but not totally untrue.
 >>/8964/
she's intelligent though. You're free to think you're smarter than her, but that doesn't make her not intelligent. Just being real here. She's ugly as fuck and annoying as fuck, and pretentious. But clearly very smart.
 >>/8963/
> I don't know if I'd feel comfortable dating a girl smarter than me
you're dumb just for thinking that. if a girl is smart enough to not be a bitch, she won't belittle you. otherwise, she's smart in the wrong way and she's not worth it.

 >>/8966/
just because pretty much anybody is smarter than you, that doesn't make her very smart, kek. seriously, it's not a competition, so who cares.
I just noticed that both her blog entries were posted on the same day of the month, maybe her posts will become a regular occurrence
 >>/8966/
I didnt wanna go there, but if she believes in socialism\communism, then she's definitely not "smart" at all.
Additionally, being overly poetic or verbose doesnt indicate intelligence. Quite the opposite actually.
ITT a bunch of losers try to repeatedly tell themselves they're smarter than a random commie to feel better
toppest of keks, the insecurity REEKS from this thread. imagine if the marky thread devolved into "she sucks at art and i'm a better artist than her."
 >>/8986/
I don't believe you because if you were, you wouldn't feel such a need to prove yourself to a bunch of literallywhos, over a junkie whore and a commie no less.
 >>/8988/
go back to your marky dump, the kind of vermin you belong to cannot possibly understand anything above the type of crack whore you're used to drool over
 >>/9014/
I’m gonna go to North Carolina and wear this in every bakery, thrift shop, and perfume store they have in hopes I will bump into ken and she will see this
she's so thin and perfectly proportioned. she grew into her body so well. she looks so delicate. her mind is beautiful too. it makes sense why she has the most female orbiters out of anyone else posted here. so many want to be her. maybe i do too
 >>/9059/
me too anon. she’s perfect, I think she’s closer to god than anyone else. I want to be her and so I emulate my personality around her and her interests. I’m not the only one
 >>/9079/
Life is intrinsically valuable and divine, women are the distraction that stops you from seeing it. 
Ironically the more you worship them the more you repel them.
thumbnail of dont get me started.jpg
thumbnail of dont get me started.jpg
dont get me started jpg
(31.15 KB, 540x539)
 >>/9079/
> women are the closest thing to God
Women are literally the reason Adam got kicked out of the garden of Eden.
Also, this simping has gone on far enough, you're triggering my autism here dude.
I'm struggling to decide what's more pathetic: simping so hard that you're ready to abdicate your own personality (although you probably had none in the first place) to replace it with some hipster delusion, or this lame imitation of a theological dispute between orthodox simps and reformed incels
now I'm curious to know how many kennedi orbiters are female, though. if there are a few of them it might explain why these threads are comparatively less aggressive, more reasonable and well-behaved than others, at least most of the times
 >>/9098/
You'll have to specify you mean female(female), not female(male).
I'd say you're mistaken in your belief. More women in the thread would lead to more hostility, not less. Just look at stuff like l0lc0w, it's just horrible petty insults over and over. Speaking of, those are a great way of identifying female posters. Petty baseless insults, and blind vague compliments.
 >>/9100/
pretty sure the poster you're replying to is female(female). there are a few confirmed already to post regularly in ken threads. one is 14 and another is some tumblr orbiter. 
but the real reason most people in ken threads arent super aggro is because most ken orbiters are hipster bois who jerk off while crying to art house movies.
thumbnail of 5289604279_90285365eb_b.jpg
thumbnail of 5289604279_90285365eb_b.jpg
5289604279_... jpg
(152.41 KB, 680x1024)
 >>/9097/
It's probably very reassuring for you to look at us and laugh like we're fighting monkeys in a zoo, but the truth is that you're in the cage with us. 
You're part of the show.
 >>/9103/
don't you ever get tired of repeating the same vapid drivel over and over again? I guess not.
> anon 1: you're pathetic / wicked / insane
> anon 2: looks like you're here with us, aren't you? btfo *displays retardedness beating chest with fists
> repeat

I'm your reality check, and god knows if you need one, so I'm actually doing you a favour. you should thank me or, even better, pay me for my services.
 >>/9101/
kek I just read this, if you think I'm female you're in for a big penile surprise. also, great description of ken orbiters, you're clearly the alpha male in your middle school
 >>/9105/
> I'm your reality check
Nobody is more detached from reality than you. 
We are the monkeys who jack off and fling shit at each other, you are the monkey who stands up straight and does a silly dance to convince the humans that he's one of them. 
We are true to our animal selves, you're a pathetic wannabe.
thumbnail of ken.jpg
thumbnail of ken.jpg
ken jpg
(145.27 KB, 750x1334)
tied to a chair watching the gorbachev pizza hut commercial frothing at the mouth like a rabid dog
 >>/9108/
... or I'm the next stage of evolution, watching your inferior dna be swept away by natural selection while you're busy talking about the incel god and eating your own excrement. enjoy yourself!
 >>/9110/
You supposedly belong to a superior species, yet a little provocation is enough to make you join our shirt-flinging monkey game, and you are so invested in it you had to double post. This is not how humans behave and you know it. 
Also the fact that you think we already had this interaction before not only means that you assiduously frequent this board, but also that the other monkeys see you a wannabe as well. 
Neckbeards know neckbeards.
 >>/9112/
again, fallacy of composition. look it up on wikipedia before you repeat it for the umpteenth time because you have nothing else to say. I'll draw a picture so you can understand it better: just because I'm here, it doesn't follow that my ideas, feelings, interests and attitude perfectly correspond to yours. if you don't get this, you won't get anything. now I'm going to double post again just to piss you off.
what I wanted to say, before being insolently distracted, is that I just think that ken female orbiters see her as a role model, so they don't feel the need to compete as their male counterparts, who are busy sexualizing egirls. therefore, female orbiters also don't feel ambivalent about ken, as they would if they were infatuated with someone they couldn't have for themselves. some girls might be envious of her, but then they wouldn't technically be orbiters. I think this explanation makes more sense than all that sweeping generalization about women.
 >>/9114/
If you are here it's because:
> you are desperate enough to care about egirls
> you are desperate enough to know this one niche egirl in particular
> you are desperate enough to do extensive Google searches about her 
> you are desperate enough to know how to post on anonymous imageboards and do it 
> you are desperate enough to come here often and get into frequent arguments
> you are desperate enough to be able to understand and conceive terms like "orthodox simps and reformed incels"
> you are desperate enough to take my provocation and try to argue with me instead of brushing it off and going back to the spectator's seat
I've been doing this shit for well over a decade. I know a miserable man when I see it, you can't fool me unless you're a bigger neckbeard than me.
 >>/9061/
>  I emulate my personality around her and her interests
So you wear designer perfumes, follow marxist ideologies and cry reading Rimbaud and Verlaine? Isn't that a bit of a faggety thing to do?
> you will never stain your fingers with pomegranate seeds by fragrantly sweet wilting lilies while reading baudelaire with ken
 >>/9115/
> ken female orbiters see her as a role model
Then they're extremely retarded. Further proof of women being retarded. I mean, no offense to fans of ken, but if a pretentious communist attention whore is your "role model", you fucked up in life.
 >>/9116/
This is correct. People who arem mentally healthy dont find obscure subforums like this. If you're anywhere near here, you're just like everyone else. This point has been made in r9k for like a decade now, but retards refuse to listen. I guess it's the reddit thing of "at least im better than that guy", but it's just a delusion since you're right next to him.
 >>/9121/
> if a pretentious communist attention whore is your "role model", you fucked up in life.
Look at it from the perspective of someone not yet redpilled on women, especially another woman or an equally hipster man. 
> loves ornate perfumes and writing poetry about them
> collects vintage valentine cards
> wears either 19th century dresses or 60s french girl fits
> draws depictions of apocryphal bible stories with a fountain pen
> trespasses into basilicas to eat rose petals
> just neurotic enough to make you care about her more and not enough to scare anyone
> finds rare tapes in record stores
> posted less selfies than the average american woman then deleted social media
> goes to goth clubs on halloween
> writes essays on love and morality
> travels to far away gardens and fills her room with fresh flowers
> runs through forests foraging for mushrooms
> has an endless amount of new movies and music to share
And most importantly, despite her being so odd and pretentious, she's loved both online and irl and managed to find friends who are similar to her. This is the dream for the average tumblrite and rym nerd, male or female. Everything you criticize her for is part of her appeal. You're not the demographic.
 >>/9122/
She did most of those things once or twice to create an online image of herself, and you eat it all up. The accounts she deleted are the ones she made for her persona, not her private ones. 
You're incredibly gullible if you think that her average day includes basilicas, goth clubs or faraway gardens, and not instagram reels, ready made food and gossip.
Here  >>/8486/ you can see that she is, or at least was a fan of Pulp Fiction and Léon the professional. Yet those movies aren't on her letterboxd, because they don't have a cool vintage poster or evocative title. 
It's all pretense.
 >>/9122/
I suppose you're right, that does sound like it'd appeal to the tumblr audience, good point.
You're also right that I'm not her audience. That stuff to me just sounds pretentious, insufferable, and manipulatively insincere.
 >>/9123/
> at least was a fan of Pulp Fiction and Léon the professional.
You're forgetting her age in that photo. There's nearly a decade gap between then and now. People don't stay liking everything they did when they were 14-15 and barely starting puberty. She's 22, man. Ridiculous.
 >>/9126/
What do you mean? You may as well ask why anyone acts the way they do. There's no magic singular answer. 
But anyway people are shaped by their lives. I know Ken's dad is a sensitive artist type, she has an academic brother who's a professor, and she's been making art her whole life and befriended other artists.
 >>/9126/
To find the truth, you need to look at things in the most cynical way possible. For example, here's my theory:
Due to stuff that happened to her early in life, like some combination of her parents' upbringing, some kind of trauma (in some egirls' cases, rape or molestation), mental illness genetics, or just general life shit, she has developed some self-image issues, leaving her insecure.
As a result, she doesnt feel comfortable narcissistically fishing for attention on normiebook, using her body and showing skin, like every other woman her age, even though she'd still get tons and tons of validation, effectively independently of what she actually looks like.
However, she still has the urge to attention whore, so she finds some other way to fill the void, and that's where her artsy shit comes in.
You see, when men like autistic niche topics, it's because they simply just like them. Women, however, do it because they need some, ANY, "identity". They do not have any "value" from within, so they need to reflect it back from other people. (This can be proven by men just DOING the autistic hobbies, while women always broadcast that shit so everyone knows they're doing it, gives them attention)
So specifically in this case, ken, does stuff like perfume reviews, or obscure movie reviews, or semi-obscure literature, not necessarily because she's passionate about the topic, but rather because it gives her a sense of "identity".
In her mind, she's "intelligent" because she reads (note how women take pics of the books they're reading. They dont care about the activity itself, it's just a vehicle to fish for attention), and she's "elegant" due to her fashion and perfume choices. This again serves the purpose of filling her void.
You guys ever see a cosplayer woman? Same exact thing. They're too insecure to show off her body normally, so she gets in costume, and THEN in her mind, she's 100% innocent and totally not a whore.

TL;DR: due to mental retardation, and her not being very good looking, she cant fish for attention using her body like normal women, so she needs to find some other thing she can use to fish for attention, like perfume, fashion, or movies.
 >>/9127/
> What do you mean? You may as well ask why anyone acts the way they do. There's no magic singular answer.
Personally I really hate it when people say this shit. It's just a feelgood bullshit way to gloss over the actual topic.
Obviously theres SOME explanation, so just going "haha lalala that's just how it works haha dont worry about it wheeee :)" doesnt answer anything.
 >>/9127/
it doesnt matter what she does, youd still call her an attention whore desperate for a fake identity. she deleted social media and still you sperg on. 

> woman doesnt show skin
insecure whore
> woman shows skin
insecure whore

> woman likes things
vapid and self obsessed, lacking identity
> woman doesnt like things
vapid and self obsessed, lacking identity

> woman reads
attention whore
> woman doesnt read
STUPID attention whore

you've already admitted you dont know anything about ken before in your autistic rampages against women in general. make your own thread about wahmin if you need to let off somesteam
 >>/9130/
For the record, you got me started due to your obsession with defending her and everything she does. Refer to the pic in  >>/9089/ as well as its filename.
Look at yourself. All you're doing is creating a strawman in your head of things I never said, just so you can think you're defending m'lady Ken. Not to mention how you didnt actually disprove any points I made, you're just throwing a tantrum.
You're so frothing at the mouth that you couldnt even reply to the right post. Lol retard.
 >>/9134/
I'm a different guy than the one you were replying to originally. there's nothing to even "disprove" because all youre doing is saying woman are all fake no matter what they do, no matter their passion, because you think that passion is fake because they're women
 >>/9135/
No their passion is fake because they always have surface level understanding of the topic, because they focus on the social aspect of it more than the acivity, and because they always need to broadcast what they do for attention.
You effectively never see men doing this shit.
 >>/9128/
 >>/9137/
Not the same guy. 
I agree 
Men don't have Rate my music
Men do not have Fragrantica
Men do not have Letterbox 
Men do not have Instagram twitter or tiktok. ....
They never seem to make Youtube videos about there hobbies either. I never seem to see them Cosplay. 
They never write poetry Blog post
In the world of social media its hard for most people to not have an outlet as some form of creative expression its just some  happen to be more into it then others
thumbnail of lovesick cotarelo kennedi.png
thumbnail of lovesick cotarelo kennedi.png
lovesick cotarelo... png
(209.83 KB, 1710x828)
thumbnail of lovesick kennedi cotarelo.png
thumbnail of lovesick kennedi cotarelo.png
lovesick kennedi... png
(293.98 KB, 1736x1116)
only putting these here to archive for when her inevitable deletion of fragrantica happens. not interesting but stood out how she used to claim she hated her parents and would only talk about how abusive they were, but now she speaks about them positively and they gift her designer perfume

Post(s) action:


Moderation Help
Scope:
Duration: Days

Ban Type:


366 replies | 76 file
New Reply on thread #7132
Max 20 files0 B total