>>/56/ > men have an evolutionary need to be perceived as masculine is this stuff wxhlyup actually says to people? lol He sounds like a "redpill alpha male" blogger who does this fetish theorizing in his freetime "evolutionary need" is just a narrative that that evopsych/evobio bloggers give to explain shit they see in the wild, it is in no way true and is easily debunked by counter examples 1. the mere existence of feminine men 2. shy sensitive boys are obviously unmasculine naturally (rather than fem in most cases) 3. strong CDs and agps, who often NEED to crossdress or transition to relieve their gender dysphoria, etc normal men on the other hand expend zero effort to be masculine of course, unlike the other groups mentioned where it's more of a painful performance > any society that takes up equality of genders...emasculating men rather than empowering women... I can agree with this, but counterpoint: these societies are more suitable for agps since there is less of a need to be masculine > 'underlying maleness' ... organism's subconcious awareness of what it is ... keep being what it is ... inherent drive to keep being alive this sounds like an attempt to ape at a "soul" or "inner nature" without using "woo-woo" spiritual terms the issue is that agps and the other aforementioned groups have a different sense of self than normal men, so that self might include being fem or becoming a woman it also discounts to what degree these traits are learned, it's not all nature or nurture, organism are adaptive > when an agp is thoroughly convinced of wanting to become a woman... which often happens in childhood, except the oppressive nature of society keeps them from doing it until they completely break down in their late 30s and 40s luckily we're transitioning younger and younger, so agps will be more integrated in womanhood for longer and avoid the deleterious mental effects of lifelong repression > a man's regular gynephilic tendency play in all this it's literally the explanation with the fewest assumptions i would imagine all men have the ability to be agp but their desire for actual women is far greater, and their masculinity is far greater which would eliminate any identification with femininity whereas agps tend to be more introverted and exist inbetween masculine and feminine, so it's easier to develop agp and trans an alternative explanation is ETLE is true and agp is actually a "woman fetish" or "femininity fetish". iirc, agps and trans chasers are much more attracted to cis women than non-agp men, as well as much more attracted to traps, trans women, feminine men, etc. then with ETLE, they are also attracted to becoming these things as well... > one of the things wxhulyp says about modern sissies is that they're burdened with the idea of self identity as a result of 'tiktokification' of sissy sphere which has blurred the distinction between sexual desire and identity > here he asks us to learn from the past ie boomer sissies when mef was present in it's raw distilled form yeah, I fucking knew it, that guy is just an out of touch boomer, he knows nothing about people today "burdened with self identity"? What is it a crime for men to not force themselves to be masculine anymore and pursue even being a woman through transitioning? modern sissies ARE NOT boomer sissies, and even boomer sissies, other than him of course, will tell you they are fundamentally different fuck "mef in it's raw distilled form" mef in its raw distilled form is dudes wearing baby clothes in pink dresses, sucking a pacifer watching his wife and daughter get RAPED by BIG BLACK COCKS, and ENJOYING it fuck that, I just want to be a woman and have a normal sex life with women or even men if I had SRS what do you consider yourself? mef sissy boomer? modern sissy? crossdresser? agp? trans? what is YOUR opinion?