>>/37938/
> durrr pedo site 
someone hasn't read clearly. they have stated they DON'T allow illegal content, like, pedo/zoophilia. Drawings are NOT part of them.  
 >>/37939/
No, you don't "just know", idiot. You've repeated the same shit year after year, and I'm not the weird arm flailing guy. Cuase you're on the internet reading news from 9 years ago doesnt mean its about your victims... leave me out of this. 
 >>/37940/
> t-that means he did- 
I think it did mean that. The only way was to delete it so you don't stalk the page for CLEARLY FICTIONAL CONTENT. 
> o-o-only to concea- 
You sound paranoid, do you want me to help you? 
> you're bound to fi- 
You won't. You're only "shaming" me because I draw fictional content. And for the record, I don't like "zoocat" or "ezra". I havent even drawn enabling art for MAPs and actual animl fuckers, so what's the point of shaming me just for ironically following, huh? I follow people, but it doens't mean I always engage on their content (unless what, they're not a -phile). 
 >>/37942/
See? Repeating yourself. You have a problem, Klim.