>>/38691/
It's actually perfect English, plus it was a justified reaction; you are disgusting.
 >>/38698/
> b-b-b-big concepts are ha- 
> spent all my night/day making a huge list of characters in upcoming universe of fiction. private of course.
> completing a few drawings and resuming some leftover project
> designed a logo that's actually good, even reminiscent of the early 90s. 
You were saying? Lol. They are NOT hard to produce, or make. It's only "hard" if you deem it "hard".
> Good coun- 
You've repeated the same 'allegations' countless of times, no one's buying them. Plus I heard from one of my actual mutuals, they had a past similar to this, but never wanted to do it again. Their name is Rob.
> that's the pr- 
The problem is you thinking I would want to do that to a real person or "minor", I do not. Their FICTIONAL character isn't representation of their own self at all, you know. Fiction is already uncrossed. 
The reality is that you need to get a grip and fuck off so you dont get fired from ur job. I wouldnt be surprised if anyone deemed you as crazy to handle a "job". 
> than you are 
Not into scat. Try again (you'll fail).
And bringing up people's kinks in arguments isn't really the best thing to do, and that's considered kinkshaming for most.
> p-parro- 
Not parroting. I don't really follow zoocat. I have never even contacted them