Actions
>>/39280/ > proving my point on posting the same images, often being incorrect/illogical "reasonings" thanks for being immature, and below intelligence. and no sane person considers a fetish "infantile". why would someone claim that an nsfw picture of a character wearing diapers and cumming in them "infantile"? > realis- you're not UK moron > w-who said the- they are jokes. and they are bad. you suck at making jokes compared to other comedians