>>/42386/
How is that justifying? 
 >>/42394/
i dont really think a cub artist suddenly moves onto real human children, they have stated they *do not* like it, and will NOT tolerate any -contact stances. why do you think some are writing a disclaimer against those who bring fetishes to real life or condone them?

You only say this because you get your mind mixed on what IS wrong and what is NOT. 
REAL feral bad. Wrong. 
FAKE, FICTIONAL, (and all talking shit) feral good. Right. 
 >>/42398/
> repeating yourself, stealing art, and posting literal children and lolis at occasion is "normal" in the elder mind, 
> but a normal rational person rightfully confronting said person for doing those things isn't 
Yeah, you're the opposite of sane.