Part 3.
BUT WHY CAN'T PEOPLE WITH MORONIC POSITIONS BE ALLOWED INTO COMMUNITY? ARE WE NOT A FREE AND LIBERAL SOCIETY IN WHICH EVERYONE DESERVES THE RIGHT TO SPEAK?

Fascist ideas infiltrated society through this kind of scam.
At first, they threw out memes and jokes, funny Pepe the Frogs, and said, "We're just discussing, we're just expressing our point of view." And Western liberals missed the moment when, from "just discussing," they went on the offensive and seized world power.

We've already established that NOT EVERY POINT OF VIEW IS IMPORTANT! NOT EVERY POINT OF VIEW IS EQUALLY USEFUL!
But now we have a question: if a dumb asshole comes to a board/forum/conference and starts spewing ideas described in Part 2 (ideas like "I'm a transgender conservative and believe that gender is anti-science"), what should we do with them?

Due to technical limitations and the nature of anonymous platforms, we have no way to determine the author's true intentions.
We can't tell if the author is an idiot or a hired provocateur? Are their posts criminally stupid or paid propaganda? We can't peer into their mind and discover their original intent.

What follows from this? That INTENTION, AS A FACTOR IN DECISION-MAKING, IS IGNORED.
When deciding what to do with the author of such posts, only the consequences should be considered: are these posts harmful? Do they contain criminal stupidity? Do they contain elements of defamation?

If so, we're not trying to find out whether the guy is a moron or just earning his 15 rubles.
Scum gets banned immediately! To all your "transsexual conservatives," "gay patriots," and other "I suck dicks, but I don't support LGBT" types. None of them have a place on forums, conferences, and communities, which, as we already established in Part 1, ARE POLITICAL FROM THE POINT OF USE! And that means a specific political position is defended and fought for within them. And there's only ONE correct one!