>>/51216/
but diddles
you have evidence that klim has groomed 1 person
and that user is 18 now
but theyve been pretty legal beforehand
so
you see how it works yet
if what you do aint pedo
then nor is what k man did
especially since you only have evidence of 1 person who was the age cooper was when you did it to him
whereas in your case there is evidence of lots of boys some as young as 10
so when k man is a groomer
you a super groomer
and when you defend what you did
you defend what the k man did
all i want is a bit of consistency
you have to pick the ruleset you want to use
double diddles
or diddlings fine
cant have it both ways bro

you still got to pick one of those three choices here  >>/51061/
> 1 what you did is pedo and what bigu and k man did is pedo
> 2 what you did is not pedo and what bigu and k man did is not pedo
> 3 you didnt do anything and neither did bigu or k man