>>/16466/
> and libs censor
... no but okay
> being pro censorship or sex work has nothing to do with communism
you're hearing what you want to hear. I said 'Literally a modern day embodiment of Western 'commies'. Can you comprehend that logic you autist?'
I was even kind enough to put 'commies' in inverted commas!
> you need to know your enemy
You read my sentence too literally. I don't mean she's a hardcore stalinist. I'm comparing her to those mutticans 'libtards' (with a lower case L) that call themselves 'commies'.
> liberal capitalists
literally what i said
> being more libertarian
> lies more right-wing because of her opinions on sex work being valid modes of capitalism
And I call her a 'commie' (referencing the libtard muttican version of 'communism') who love freedom but actually don't because they would adore the opportunity to control what you can and can't say (censorship).