>>/16258/
> Do you know how to get rid of an elephant in the room? You acknowledge it and then move on.
How does that get rid of it? The only way to get rid of it is to deal with it first, then move on to the smaller stuff.
> the recipient may show consent
> I'm sure she's consented.
This started when she was 15. She wasn't legally able to consent until she turned 17.
> genius groomer (like you portray him as
I did not portray him as a genius whatsoever.
> (kinda weird...))
What exactly are you trying to imply here?
> age of consent laws exist but that doesn't grant the victim full immunity
I believe it does. Feel free to correct me though as I don't know the local laws. This of course doesn't include stuff like fraud, which has nothing to do with the age of consent.
> what else
> Paypal scamming
you already mentioned that like 3 times, I asked what else
> child pornography infractions (could make a case with
None of that is even remotely cp. Maybe she sent something to seth in private, but we don't know that.
> she was not 17 here
You mean 18. It's always 18 for porn. The age of consent being lower doesn't change that.
>>/16259/
> sexual manner
I don't see it.