>>/62344/
 >>/62346/
I see right through that, it's a plot to discredit still existing tubeless safety concerns by false flagging every minor incident. Consumers who were previously on the fence will inquire if and how exactly the tire blew off only to find out that in reality nothing of this sort happened at all. This in turn will make them discard any incidents (if there were any) and any anti-tubeless people as fake news and fake news spreaders, thus leading to more adoption of the technology. One question remains:
Who is paying you?