thumbnail of Monarkismo Estrutural.png
thumbnail of Monarkismo Estrutural.png
Monarkismo Estrutural png
(1.51 MB, 1530x858)
thumbnail of Neo-Monarkismo Com Características Cariocas.png
thumbnail of Neo-Monarkismo Com Características Cariocas.png
Neo-Monarkismo Com... png
(1.01 MB, 1516x863)
> monark from Flow Podcast throws another pearl hoping that as well as the other times nothing happens.
> something happens.
> new and old opponents make sure something really happens.
> a few hours later the fucking NATIONAL JOURN makes it clear that something really happened.

The guys, for the sake of convenience, in order to preserve the "poeticlicence" of speaking any shit, refused to admit that they were big and relevant. Monark speaks a shit bigger than usual and ends up shaking all her years' work and possibly staining the entire national scene of tablescasts/podcasts.
Makes you think...
The PCO took this as an opportunity to raise its flag and was criticized by all the other parties and relevant figures of the left; however, the PCO's stance does not seem very different from the historical stance of the Marxist parties , although the PCO is Trotskyist; they took the opportunity to put themselves as opposition to the left of the rest, defending freedom of unrestricted expression (incompatible with bourgeois freedoms).
A controversy on the internet was relevant enough to appear in the National Journal; parallel to this, the case Joe Rogan is making the traditional U.S. media enter into screw. Both cases serve, to a greater or lesser extent, so that the great media reaffirms its supposed higher virtues in relation to content generated exclusively by the internet; obviously, the reactionary character of the Flow and most of the other tablescasts does not differ much from the traditional reactionism, but the great problem is that I fear that cases so can be a trigger for a new "Adpocalipse" as what happened in 2016-17 and so will become the revolutionary vegoous productions of
In fact, I think everyone will agree, put, the guy is not Nazi, kek, the guy clearly is not Nazi; in a "competition to see who is more Nazi" he would certainly lose to any presenter of those newspapers passing on cable TV.
Does a comrade have anything else to say about the case?