>>/2075/
> Да вы, батенька, никак читали переписку Перельмана с Тао?
British mathematician and Fields medalist Timothy Gowers remarked on Tao's breadth of knowledge:[29]
Tao's mathematical knowledge has an extraordinary combination of breadth and depth: he can write confidently and authoritatively on topics as diverse as partial differential equations, analytic number theory, the geometry of 3-manifolds, nonstandard analysis, group theory, model theory, quantum mechanics, probability, ergodic theory, combinatorics, harmonic analysis, image processing, functional analysis, and many others. Some of these are areas to which he has made fundamental contributions. Others are areas that he appears to understand at the deep intuitive level of an expert despite officially not working in those areas. How he does all this, as well as writing papers and books at a prodigious rate, is a complete mystery. It has been said that David Hilbert was the last person to know all of mathematics, but it is not easy to find gaps in Tao's knowledge, and if you do then you may well find that the gaps have been filled a year later.
Кальсон, чего ты добиваешься, компульсивно пытаясь доебаться до совершенно неуязвимых пунктов в моём посте? Нейродегенерация зашла так далеко, что ты не можешь выполнить п.2 из методички Алинского?