(269.04 KB, 710x459)
(1.21 MB, 585x768)
(4.28 KB, 456x232)
>>/243/ my whitey habibi IQ is irrelevant. Intelligence is much more related to environmental factors. Studies looking for genetic links to intelligence have largely failed. The closest they've come is a very weak statement, like "These 5 genes (at once) are associated with +2 IQ points". i.e IQ is a myth, it does not measure intelligence There's no such a thing as a genetically inferior "Race", race is a sociological classification. race is a societal construct, not a biological one. There are culturally inferior races but not genetically inferior races. The idea that intelligence is MAINLY related to genetics is pseudoscienctific in:b4 > but anon, phenotype is not sociology. Grouping based on a culture's traditional interpretation of phenotype is sociological. watch this to get a better insight into what I am talking about https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLyVghncmfCibQ1kgPyQEuRfb2V8qQHP_B&app=desktop Now my argument goes: > The higher the level of education, the higher the IQ and vice versa > Countries/groups with shit cultures, with/or suffer from corrupt politics and governments, bad economics, bad environments and bad sociological factors tend to have low IQ results (because people living under these conditions tend to lose interest in education or don't receive good education at all) > Countries/groups living under good sociological conditions and in good environments, living with good culture, and living under noncorrupt politics i.e don't suffer from corrupt politics tend to receive good education, thus score high on IQ tests. > Therefore; Good education is the result of non corrupt governments and politics > Therefore; if a group receives good education/have any interest in education (culture and sociology play a role in the interest) will score high on IQ tests > Therefore; IQ is related to politics, culture, environment, and sociology, not genetics. (pic related) And again, Asians score higher than the whites on IQ tests; therefore your claim about being genetically superior falls apart. Beat it whitey, you're not superior. (ofc I am speaking as if IQ is even an accurate measurement of intelligence) Intelligence is just so complex to be quantified into numbers or measured, IQ is a myth. 85 IQ (average IQ of Egyptians) is not = low intelligence, it's = low level of education (which is the result of corrupt politics, governments, and leaders). And non-interest in education is the result of sociological and cultural factors. IQ doesn't explain how a bunch of supposedly "low intelligent" half naked men could build something so complex as The Pyramids Of Giza with primitive tools? It doesn't explain how The Greeks could build something like The Colossus Of Rhodes when they're supposed to be of "below average intelligence i.e low intelligence" because they have an average IQ of 95? (OH, Greece has an average IQ of 95 {pic related} i.e below average/low, and that proves that the whites are not actually genetically superior or intelligent {according to your idea that IQ is an accurate measurement of intelligence} since they have the tendency to score below the average on IQ tests. Now back to the main point) I'll continue in a different reply