>>/2112/
> eugenics
The British conception of eugenics is not the same as the "Aryan" concept in its goals. The British concept is more of an aristocratic breeding program, as well as maintaining a racial caste system. The German concept of "Aryan" isn't merely physical but cultural and also a means for cultural unity in destroying meaningless infighting factions that were also controlled by the jews which was why both Catholic and Lutheran churches were done away with for Positive Christianity, culling out the parasites from both in the process. This is also lead to promoting physical health and discouraging miscegenation which the bible throughout the Old Testament and somewhat in the New Testament as to why it's not good to be unequally yoked together, not having strings of two different types sown together, discouraging people from marrying certain tribes and people. St. Paul circumcised Timothy to have him be more accepted among the ethnic Judahite community that he resided in as a means to express devotion and love of his (Timothy's) Judahite mother side instead of his Grecian father's side. Why? It's just how "racist" people in the bible were, even refusing to talk to Samarian people despite being genetic cousins since they had Israelite blood in them since God had rejected them yet at the same time, had sought after to restore the "Israel of God" instead of establishing a physical Kingdom of Judah under Jesuh Christ when he walked on earth. I can share many verses of proof that race was and still is a big deal for the Israelites in the Old Testament and Christians in the New, you just were fed utter dog shite from gatekeeping charlatans.

> giants
There's just no way to objectively prove the testimony of the bible in a serious physical, empirical way when there's no proper evidence to back it up. It is only by faith one trusts the bible as not committing hearsay or simply straight up lying to you. The bible isn't a science textbook, it isn't necessarily always literal in every circumstance while there's varying degrees of speculation going on. Asserting speculations as if it is the truth is the most foolish thing anyone can make, is fundamentally no different than believing that the tribe of Dan having achieved space flight just because of one bible verse. Everything is context specific, so what makes contextual sense within the narrative of the bible doesn't necessarily align with reality since anyone can twist any narrative into another thing altogether. People didn't suddenly sought to overthrow the government when they've found out the earth was not flat but instead a sphere, so is the same when finding out an odd statement that you accept as truth, it doesn't change reality. In other words: so what, because Germans aren't literally giants.

> Guido von List, Jorg Lanz and Helena Petrovna Blavatsky
Who cares, you simply ignore everything Adolf Hitler had said and done. You probably never read any of those people's writings for yourself, only bits and pieces from the very people that demonize them in their own twisted narratives. I've already said there's similarities in various religions and how Hitler had used Christian concepts. All that which is supposedly hidden is not really hidden at all, it's just presented by charlatans as if it was occulted when it is not. Being super literal is ironically blinding you from understanding another religion from their own perspective, and so failing to understand it from without but as an outsider incapable of understanding anything that's being presented to you because you simply have no preface, no introduction to it that isn't from an outside view.