>>/24253/
> We all are born to listen to our parents, then teachers, media, friends etc. Does it make sense? Is it logical? We are born to this world and think everything is normal because everyone else think so. And our parents this its normal because their parents did it to.

Yes, we don't investigate for ourselves, but use that second-hand knowledge for granted.

> we arent really allowed to discover our true selves in this world

> allowed

But are we capable of? That looks suspicious too. Maybe the call to find out who you are is another trick, to inspire an illusion of meaning? "I'm not the body" solves easy, because body is perceived, thus there are two: the perceiver and the body. But when the perceiver tries to perceive the perceiver, what should be perceived?

> I've read accounts on native populations where they could sit and look at a lake for hours. The modern man would think, whats the purpose of that? Whats the meaning? Does it have to have a meaning? We are so blinded by our profit system.

Sounds great!

> https://youtube.com/watch?v=XzBAFoCqtRc

Thank you, I'm going to watch all those through.

 >>/24256/
> Im very sceptical about reincarnation because its based on a slave system

There is a way to see life as a game (Lila), which turns both Karma and Nirvana into a joke.

> the hindu religion and later other religions said that the upper classes deserved to be that way because they were good people and the slaves deserved it. Its a load of bollocks imo.

Yes, that sounds like a way to justify the inequality. But what if one be born as a miserable in one life, a king in another, a sage then, a tree, and so on infinitely? Sometimes you eat the bear, and sometimes the bear eats you, remember? Would that explain (and reconcile) the whole thing?