>>/24742/
> So nothing is sacred is your point?
Hmm, you may interpret it like this, but I didn't had that in mind.
My point was about separating humans and other nature. Humans are part of nature, and so-called anthropological ecological catastrophes are same thing as natural disaster or extinct events. Don't think that this can be good or bad. Concept of sacredness is ok though, it is also natural thing that shapes biosphere (by influencing human actions).
And that asteroid killed dinosaurs (and many other species too), but that was one big reason why we are here. That event wasn't very environmental friendly, and not even natural from Earth's point of view, but look how it ended.
This can be interpreted as dao-style way about going with the flow, although this is slightly cynical indeed.