Actions
(37.74 KB, 1441x187)
Later we will return to Mr. Révay because he adds a very controversial detail for Crown researchers, but for now let's continue with the other curiosity in the Wikipee articles. This time it isn't on the page of the Crown. In 1993-94 another group of goldsmiths was allowed to examine the Crown, most likely because the so called Crown Committee wasn't pleased by the results of the previous band, who can be suspected that they wanted to find answers to certain questions and dismissed other facts they could have included in their work but didn't fit into their agenda. This Committee was set up right at the moment when the Crown returned home from the US, and was the most influential authority in Crown-research up until 2000, since they could decide whom to allow in the vicinity of the Crown. By the 90's it was consisted of four people, an archaeologist/art historian, a museologist/art historian and two goldsmiths. The new goldsmith group was basically them. I didn't have access to their reports - I think I mentioned this before, and I think it is an awful shame but this is what it is - so I read what's written on the Hungarian Wiki article about this. There are some interesting things here but there is one particular one about the "Corona Latina", which we already know it wasn't a crown at all in any point of it's history. The article says that the goldsmiths found evidence that the cross straps were longer and contained the missing 4 apostles of the twelve.