>>/31938/  >>/32054/  >>/32055/  >>/32058/  >>/32060/  >>/32071/  >>/32072/  >>/32076/  >>/32077/  >>/32079/  >>/32101/  >>/32138/  >>/32139/  >>/32141/  >>/32150/
If you actually opened Tooze's book (available in OP for dl) and check the "Notes" section (starting on page 689) you would actually see what sources the author used, among them you would find great many documents the administration of the German Reich produced itself, and the own written works of such notable National Socialist figures like Halder or Speer.
What sources do you base your claims you try to wave away the conclusions based on aforementioned sources? What were the acceptable sources of your choice?
While you giving your divine statements you get into self-contradictions, not on one occasion - although I will quote only one due to lack of time and space (but it is right in your first post to this topic!):  >>/31938/
> It was poverty and famine.
> Hitler's economic policies were super successful and raised the living standards
So which is it?
You also resort to name calling:  >>/32054/
> Shlomo
Providing red herrings/whataboutisms:  >>/32055/
> Winston the spendaholic
Not to mention cherrypicking and your confirmation bias. With which we arrived to the point what was already touched ny Brazil Bernd: your posting reeks of indignation as if someone would have insulted your precious German Reich ****. Like:
> how dare you calling it weak
> how dare you insinuate they used SHLAAAAAAVEEEEEEEEESHHHHHH
> IT'S ALL LIES LIEEEEEEEEEEEEEES, PROPAGANDA
etc. etc.
These are all weakening your side of the argument, and generally what you wrote cannot be taken seriously. 

Yeah, criticism have to be applied to Tooze's work, ofc, like how Tooze arrives to the false conclusion to label the German economy weak when even the data himself provided in the book, and posted here:  >>/28367/
> 2nd image: compared national income.png
...shows it's the third largest/strongest economy at the timeframe given (sadly Japan wasn't shown on that list) way ahead of the main rival of the continent: France (even tho somewhat poorer than her in some respect).
Despite these Anglo biases Tooze also shows, if you would spend the time actually looking into it, you would see he provides valuable data and interesting insights how the Reich's economy worked.

So you really should reconsider your strategy of arguing. My advice is: start small. Pick one point and argue against that. Look up actual sources other than pol memes and stormfront posts. I think you don't try to troll, you really believe what you post (judging by the emotional charge your posts give away and the length of them) but if you want to be taken seriously consider what I wrote. Especially about the claims and statements hanging in the air I mentioned at the beginning of this comment.