>>/41969/
> I don't get what they mean 'medical emergencies'.
Maybe got heart attack, or got trampled, maybe allergic reaction to whatever. I dunno.
>>/41973/
> >pro-trump Peaceful Protesters ;)
What is the source of this quote?
> at least 10s or 100 thousand people there, which they easily could considering about half the voters chose Trump.
Nod really. Most voters aren't really active in anything. Plus it's a fair guess most of these people were from DC and nearby. (Ok. The east coast is chokefull of people and for American scales every major city is nearby. So you have a point there, even 200-300 thousand of people isn't that much compared.)
> Of course a good fraction of them should have been armed too,
No. There is no point, they can't coup the US, they can't form their own government, they can't even start a civil war. They can however trigger the death of bunch of people, pointlessly, because even from that nothing would come out of, nothing would change. Accelerationists are braindead idiots.
> LMAO xDDDD
I know. The press and the statements of the politicians are often hilarious.
> Can't have police shooting peaceful protesters
Actually we really can't have. Commies shot protesters. Law enforcement should be prepared to take down people in non-lethal ways.