>>/44473/
I understand now, it all makes sense considering the fact linguistic divisions were basis of quasi scientific racism and nationalism wave. Fun fact kurds are classified as turanids since many couldnt not speak kurdish especially their feudal lords and other higher ups. Fast forward to republic times we wanted to take Mosul due to Turkmen population and Kurdish population to strenthen our thesis in Leauge of Nations we put forward the fact of that era Kurds are turanids therebefore Mosul should be ours and we showed encyclopedia brittanica as citiation that was the moment of course they rejected, they also changed the clasiffication of kurds. Muh Turk bad overly nationalistic, we the blue blooded ones never involve in politics god forbid.. this is the thing they want us to believe.
Anyway I digressed a little. In that era linguistics and genetics were definitive when it came to definition of race that was the motivation behind the classification of the kurds, so speaking something non indo-european could degrade you not to mention lumping you with seemingly unrelated finns who are also in yoke of another nation might be seen as degrading to the point to a deliberate made up claim to crush hungarian national spirit.
By the way Scythian language have shitloads of Turkic words but again they are not even answered. Pomponious Mela the roman geographer has used the word Turcae around Crimea, some people claim it must be thracians but thracians on the map are already pointed out on a place where they ought to be. Now I don't make the claim all scythians were Turks and shiet but the whole Turks were residing in east of mongolia not even true considering we most likely become what we are in west of lake baikal which is not east of altai mountains where mongolians and manchus resided perspective seems too unlikely when you consider how the coincidences.