Revolution is a thing like the total war in Szálasi's vocabulary. A tool that creates a new order.
But the coups only "corrects" the already existing system, the parallel of offensive/defensive wars - how Szálasi thought about those.
If we think of this >>/45131/ idealistically, and suppose they were honest and had the best intention, they wanted to correct a deviation:
> Constitutional processes failed to topple the government, which deliberately wanted to bolshevize the Country.
So it really can't be called a revolution, and it is a dishonesty on their part. However they can't say otherwise for the previous reasons: >>/45135/