>>/45337/
... How many women have you even talked to? How many sisters do you have? This is fairly common knowledge. Most women don't even like s*x which makes sense as you probably would know, it's a lot different for a man than a woman in that a man pretty much always climaxes whereas a woman doesn't most the time. They are also nowhere near as driven by lust as men and nowhere near as attracted to the opposite sex as men, women would rather see a man in a suit than naked because they are not actually that attracted to men physically but they are attracted to status and personality. It's why there is a huge industry made to cater towards lustful men but that industry simply doesn't exist for women. Well it barely does, there is some literature that caters towards them but that reinforces my point, it's not the visual and physical nature of a man that attracts a women but what that man represents which is often better portrayed in literature.
> You can't make that argument since you did not read the book.
Well I am just going by what you said so any error is on your part, perhaps you should read the book.
> You can't tell if they are the same or not, since you did not read the book.
... I'll humour you. In what ways are they the same that I would not know because I have not red the book?
> Eowin is set up as a warrior woman. And ends up as a housemaid. What kind of author creates such arc?
Well that's what happens, people marry. I really don't get how you can complain about women not being realistic because they don't conform to your 21st century s*x fantasies but then complain when they settle down and get married like pretty much everybody does and particularly like what would have been expected in the 1940s/50s. It kind of goes with the rest of the ending, that the threat is gone and everybody can live happily and in peace.
I plan to read the book at some point but I have so much to get through and it's fairly low on my list of priorities.