>>/45343/
I was not talking about that but in response to.
> Also we already established that since the birth of literature every writer (except Tolkien and similarly Victorian influenced Anglos) had healthy attitude towards women and sexuality. Nothing particular 21st century in anything I wrote.
But anyway, as I have said, there is nothing wrong with having 5 named women in a book particularly when adding more would changes things so much and changed things from the story the author was trying to create as I have said repeatedly. There is nothing wrong with adding more women or adding fewer women, it's all dependent on the story the author wants to create but you can't dictate that the author should add more or less and change the story to a different one with different themes and even different genres just because you as an individual don;t like that genre, it goes back to complaining that a historical fiction writer isn't writing fantasy or vice versa.
Fairly tale and fantasy are separate things, people often don't really understand what a fairly tale is.