fe.settings:getUserBoardSettings - non array given[kc] - Endchan Magrathea
Bernd
No. 48586 [Open] [Reply]
Actions
thumbnail of Figura-2-Malhas-rodoviaria-ferroviaria-e-hidroviaria-dos-anos-de-1975-e-2005-Fonte.png
thumbnail of Figura-2-Malhas-rodoviaria-ferroviaria-e-hidroviaria-dos-anos-de-1975-e-2005-Fonte.png
Figura-2-Ma... png
(145.74 KB, 850x1261)
thumbnail of 11170.jpg
thumbnail of 11170.jpg
11170 jpg
(287.84 KB, 900x1253)
thumbnail of NOV-D-4-4-B-2-215.jpg
thumbnail of NOV-D-4-4-B-2-215.jpg
NOV-D-4-4-B-2-215 jpg
(1.37 MB, 5315x3561) 
 >>/48585/
> The concept sounds a bit cooked. And forced. Feels kinda unnecessary. I see it is set into some kind of pair with thassalocracy, maybe for the need to name a group where non-thassalocratic states/countries can be included. So it sounds more liek exclusion from that group, which doesn't really belong (compare it to Bri'un) then get moved to the other.
Dugin was thinking geopolitically, tying imperial geography to trade/transport and then to how an empire has to organize its military, society and politics to control its territory. I have no idea if the article does justice to his theory, it's brief and doesn't get into the nuances. When an empire did form in South America, it was a lot different from the Eurasian land empires, either because of circumstances or geography.
Brazil becomes more land-based in the republican period, with the Navy becoming of secondary importance to the Army and a conscious, long-term and still incomplete effort to move the economic center of northward and inland. This is best symbolized by the capital's transfer to Brasília. A poweful bureaucratic apparatus and central authority did form. On the other hand, instead of "conservatism and the permanence of legal norms", there was greater political instability.