(215.58 KB, 924x548)
(169.4 KB, 533x441)
(136.07 KB, 979x655)
>>/50407/ Then they had to replace the crew too, a T-55 driving loicence ain't a Leo2 one. >>/50409/ What Ukraine don't have is equipment, and lots of troops are in training. I think they should have soldiers under training in the West, it's not like they got trained some brigades and finished, it should go as a continuous cycle. > get the Russians to concentrate their attention on one part of the front and commit their reserves The Russians should have local reserves and strategic ones. And local local reserves. At this stage, when they are holding the forward positions, the outposts they probably launch counter-thrusts with the local local ones. But I do agree it's dangerous to let forces pinned down at one are when Ukies can strike elsewhere. And I also don't know if they'll let it or not. Or it's avoidable at all. > No blitzkrieg to the Black Sea anytime soon. That is a pretty safe bet. I was browsing militaryland's deployment and "operational sectors" map yesterday. Couple of things to note, probably not the most interesting ones, and perhaps not even important ones. But here we go. Yesterday there was a mechanized grouping of 6 brigades north of the reservoir. Now only 2. At Siversk there should be a strong grouping - I heard, but there is a hole. There a was strike from that direction towards Soledar, which was stopped. Militaryland notes a mountain brigade there or whatever. At Velike Novosilka, towards the east that tank brigade wasn't there, but a bit further north behind the lines with that other one.