Actions
(5.38 MB, 480x852 h264)
Two things. 1. This could be fairly uncomfortable, private ties, foreign interests, corruption. https://xcancel.com/SarahAshtonLV/status/1819698313769423210#m This person is kinda controversial being a tranny or whatever. Weirdly enough Trump's vice president candidate, JD Vance, had a run in with him: https://www.newsweek.com/ukraine-suspends-transgender-spokesperson-after-fight-republican-1828640 From the article it seems he's very committed to battling Russians, if anything. As he notes in the video, he tried to resolve the issue through official channels, with his superiors in the chain of command, without success. This is why he made this thing public. It seems a private group intends to get large amount (over 200 000 kgs) of explosives from the US via Syrsky, circumventing the Ukrainian MoD. This shit is highly suspicious, just imagine, Bernd, if you'd turn to a general (the commander-in-chief no less) of your country to get weapons for you from another country's military without telling it to the PM/Pres of your country. What the fuck. If I was liek: > yo buddy, don't tell Orbán, but get some of that Lancets from the Russians I'm deliberately not giving USA as an example, but someone we aren't in a military alliance with Anyway... there are some documents in that thread on twitter. 2. Business insider video about US spending on Ukrainian war. https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=WhhovQ7HW4k https://youtube.com/watch?v=WhhovQ7HW4k At 0:44 the narrator says: > in a war some have called a stalemate He said this on 2024 August 4 Anno Domini, when the Russians slowly but surely move forward - and towards victory - for months now. They take larger and larger bites with constant pace, or even accelerating pace. This situation is not something that can be described as stalemate. I wonder when the narration will shift and acknowledge that Ukraine is losing.