>>/8979/
> absolutely BTFO'd like I know you must've been used to
It's funny that you're coming from the assumption I must've because you're supposedly so great at it, but let's be honest there for a second, I've seen much much better.
 >>/8980/
Now that I think about it, the english "rags" as you call them do get much more credibility just by existing in english. If I saw that in a shitty mag/ on a shitty site in my native I would be like, yea okay, where's the source though, because I do not believe a word from there normally.