thumbnail of 1728974467443.jpg
thumbnail of 1728974467443.jpg
17289744674... jpg
(223.11 KB, 1080x1587)
DoD 5240.01 Directive


Georgetown University:
https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/1053883


PDF Download: (335 KB)
https://files.catbox.moe/asmibr.pdf


Pastebin Archived:
https://archive.ph/pK0xY


Pastebin Backup:
https://ghostarchive.org/archive/9erGj



__




DoD Directive 5240.01

Reissued on September 27, 2024

Quick Summary

New provisions: The updated directive expands the circumstances under which the DoD can assist law enforcement, including the use of lethal force.

Assassination explicitly forbidden: While assassination is banned, the new language allows for lethal actions under "imminent threats."

Concerns about civil liberties: The expanded definition of "national security threats" is raising alarms, particularly given DHS’s broader definition of domestic terrorism threats.

High-level approval required: Any intelligence-sharing that could lead to lethal force must be approved by the Secretary of Defense, but Component Heads can act immediately for up to 72 hours before obtaining approval.

Introduction

As the U.S. prepares for one of the most controversial and closely watched elections in its history, a concerning update to DoD Directive 5240.01 has quietly been put into effect. Reissued on September 27, 2024, this directive governs the Department of Defense's (DoD) intelligence activities and now includes provisions authorizing lethal force in certain circumstances when assisting civilian law enforcement. While the directive forbids assassination, it opens the door to lethal interventions under "national security" conditions, albeit with stringent restrictions on how such interventions are to be authorized.

This directive, reissued under the authority of the Secretary of Defense as per standard Department of Defense procedures, carries significant weight in shaping military operations and intelligence activities. While DoD Directives are typically internal policy documents, the implications of this particular update extend far beyond the walls of the Pentagon, potentially affecting civilian life and constitutional rights.


___