I really hope endchan doesn't give in to tolerating pedos in any way. Their posting style is obnoxious enough that they'd require a ban even if they were advocating for some other mundane thing. >>/2253/ Brilliant, you scoffer of back to freech or wherever you came from and we'll keep our fascist anti pedo rulechan to ourselves here. No one's forcing you to stay. (Still support discussions though). >>/2254/ Protip: I suspect these "pedos" all have relatively common (and specific) job occupations. >>/2311/ The boy should scold her. (9yo? What is wrong with you?) >>/2319/ It's autism spectrum, and don't insult us like that. Let me remind you that a lot of things are off limits to children because they can be harmful to oneself (eg. alcohol, weed, cigarettes, prostitution, porn, even driving and voting could be included). There's a reason that the limit is so high. It's not so much a physiological matter (even though I'm pretty sure I couldn't feel anything down there apart for sheer discomfort when the sensitive part was touched until I was at least 12) as much as it it one of experience, maturity, and wisdom/knowledge. Being aware of or able to calculate all potential consequences before indulging. Sex brings STDs. It is also addictive, and can cause wear. Its purpose is making children, not pleasure, so any argument in favor of >13yo is null. Before 23 people are usually too mentally immature/inexperienced for marriage. Nevertheless, the limit is at ~18 in most of the west, and lower in more uncivilized countries. >>/2562/ I'm using Tor right now, I hate this stupid argument, what do you think it solves? Just add capthas, 3 sec delay per post, or both. If even that doesn't fix it, get more mods. Worst comes to worse don't show uploaded images until they've been seen and approved by the mod. The last one would require text to be treated as separate from the media attached however, nntpch is also having a problem with this iirc (posts with attachments being completely dropped/rejected on nodes that don't allow them, meaning the text is lost as well and so no sync). >>/4395/ > Hebrew Read: not Khazar/Edomite/Pharisee/Turkic. Jews hated Jesus, and still do. > Bible supports men taking female children as brides. > Deuteronomy chapter 22, verses 28-29, in hebrew, allows men to rape female children. The man then pays the father 50 silver and doesn't send the girl away ever. > Other passages command the hebrews to take the "women children" as their own. Brilliant, so you understand then that it's got nothing to do with Christianity but simply stability of our civilization, a shield against chaos and recklessness. FYI, I'm against women being allowed to vote and many other rights they've recently got. Ironically, it's because they are the main reason the west is so liberal and socialist today, allowing fags and people like you to run free without consequences. >>/4397/ Don't like it? Create another where that's allowed. No one's stopping you. Or just move to an already existing one like masterchan or freech for example. (Enjoy your honeypot, lol). Anyway, it was interesting reading your discussion, anons, nice read. To be fair and stay a bit more on topic though, (suggestive?) pictures of children should be contained to one board and banned everywhere else. Problem solved, and it should keep everyone happy, unless anyone's got an argument against that. I've got no problem with zero tolerance of it though, as long as we clearly state that it's forbidden. No "We're pro free speech" statements on our behalf unless we clearly state that we mean text only, not uploadable media. Or just, you know, keep it legal. No more arguments needed. It's a clearnet accessible site after all. It's not as if we're banning discussions, are we?