>>/1183/
Redundant garbage. Why not "This program may be used by anyone"?
# 1) h) This program may be used by anyone.
You're clearly contrasting "laity" with "clergy", but to be "laity", you have to be a lay-member of a religion. I guess those without religious affiliation can't use your software. What if they're believers, but aren't officially enrolled members of a church? Do they get a pass?
# 1) e) This program may be used by anyone of any affiliation, political viewpoint, political affiliation, religious belief, religious affiliation, and by those of non-belief or non affiliation.
You list all these vehicles, but not a car? Can't I use the software in a car? What about a bus? If I can use it anywhere, why not just say "anywhere"?
# 2) c) This program may be used anywhere.
You clearly either can't read or have a poor memory and poor attention to detail.
I see your point in general. However enumerating who you allow to use your software is not a an enumeration of those you exclude. You fail at logic, on this point as well.
>>/1184/
> Any user of this program is granted the freedom to run this code on any computer of their choice.
I can run it on other people's computers without their permission!? Nice!
Certain software licenses specify which computers you are allowed to run software on, I allow you to run my software on which ever computer you choose to run it on. Now if you're breaking the law (doing so without the computer owner's permission ) that has nothing to do with my copyright grant to you. You fail at logic and at law.
The enumerations presented were examples and are not meant to be exhaustive, however they were meant to be funny. And also as explained in line 18:
# 18) Sections 0) a) 0) b) and 1) a) are sufficient for use; however sections 1) b) through 1) h) are presented to clarify 1 a) and to enforce non-discrimination and non-exclusion of use.
# For example some people may choose to redefine the meaning of the words "person" "human being" or "sentient individual" to exclude certain types of people.
# This would be deemed unacceptable and is specifically rejected by the enumeration presented. If the wording presented is problematic please contact us and suggest a change,
# and it will be taken into consideration.
# 1) h) This program may be used by anyone.
# 2) c) This program may be used anywhere.
> The only thing that I seriously prohibit is someone claiming that they made it and then close sourcing it and patenting the technology.
What in Endware do you think is patentable?
Nothing yet, but you never know, I might cook something up next week that qualifies.
> I might show up to court to challenge that, and I wouldn't need lawyers to back me up.
Why, are you a patent lawyer?
I'm the creator, inventor, originator, and copyright holder over all of the files, and I can prove all of that in several ways.
Your complaints that you have brought up are now dismissed, the summary is that you have reading comprehension and memory retention problems.
I'll deal with more of your complaints later if I feel like it.