thumbnail of a4ff4e11-eaef-4484-90cb-d779dfedab36.png
thumbnail of a4ff4e11-eaef-4484-90cb-d779dfedab36.png
a4ff4e11-eaef-44... png
(678.48 KB, 596x706)
thumbnail of View file metadata (EXIF d_ -.png
thumbnail of View file metadata (EXIF d_ -.png
View file... png
(40.45 KB, 412x911)
thumbnail of View file metadata.png
thumbnail of View file metadata.png
View file... png
(111.21 KB, 755x1263)
 >>/102883/
You missed my question:
> What the fuck even is this?
Classified physical sample? Follicular material? Unique biometric patterns? Of what? Over 16 million for hairs?
Burn it live? Is it hair follicles or software? How do you even analyze it if you're implying you're not the seller?
> A sealed sample will be delivered.
> This is not a joke. It's part of something bigger.
> Metadata contains trace identifiers.
Is this some zero-day hack or human hairs? And why should anyone care? What you're not doing is explaining this bullshit. Blatant cryptic obscurity.