>>/103149/
> Evola

Reminder to you he after the war threw under the bus nsdap and fascist party to save his own skin and have some small revenge on heinrich himmler whom rejected his ideas 
> In a lot of ways it is left wing, at least by the standards of it's time. 

Okay lets do some chcecking on this
Did nsdap nationalized private ownership?
Did nsdap created a central bank with monopoly on credit?
Did nsdap wedged a class clashing or class cooperation?
Did nsdap promoted idea of meritocracy or equality?
Did nsdap promoted idea of every man and woman is equal?
Was nsdap gynocentric?
Was nsdap biased for unions or did they dissolved them into DAF
Did nsdap banned strikes or not?
> Since they were for "The People" they were left wing for the time

What a stupid lukewarm assumption
Nsdap never used this in a sense to boost class clashing but in a sense as every national movement did in a racial context
> brought in a lot of socialists at least on the ground level of their parties as well as backing the working class people.


And then for no reason at all night of the long knives began and in italy their own botched clean ups that had bitten them later with parrisans during the war