Actions
(328.68 KB, 523x680)
(51.73 KB, 850x400)
(40.28 KB, 850x400)
(84.17 KB, 638x680)
>>/103272/ > They were wrong because they thought their disapproval could halt the tide. nietzsche foresaw a development towards his ideals though, he often referst to "those philosophers of the future" in excitement & anticipation. he was more of a avant garde thinker, only a few decades after his death hitler made some of the übermensch promise a reality. > their disapproval could halt the tide i didnt even care about any of that, just because its inevitable its not in vain to discuss it, you seem to think only in pragmatic terms, as though you only want to judge such a dispute over technological progress only by the standards of the utalitarian value it serves for our lives. > we cant change it anyway, so why talk about it lol. for me the psychological evaluation of those prompt artists was important since, again, i observed them enjoying traditional artists lose their jobs over the ai thing & further to draw a parallel to previous technological leaps such as photography. > people dont change & enjoy seeing those with talent potentially lose their fame & livelihood. just like the antifa, the communist concept of fairness is not about being elevated as high as the most well-off but to drag everyone down on their level, thats the core observation here i guess.