(358.59 KB, 1898x626)
(90.94 KB, 621x464)
(34.78 KB, 640x481)
>>/72080/ > In Revolt Against The Modern World, Evola mentions Admiration of Evola does not belong here. > Adolf himself, while not using this method directly, was considered a man worthy of adulation despite being merely an average gentleman in appearence > so one must ask if it was his oratory that led to him being held in such high regard. That belongs here. The rest of that.. >>/72081/ and this, I agree with. > Had Hitler focused efforts solely on ultra nationalists it's likely his movement would of struggled even with the horrors of Weimar True. It's often a false statement that Hitler believed in "the master race" when the only time he ever mentioned it was to label jews. Hitler was for the German people, not the usual fake "blonde hair and blue eyes only!" narrative. The Hofbrauhaus, Friday the 15th on August 1920 was were he said, "Here everyone works exactly according to the instincts of his race, because the race, or should we say, the nation and its character, as the Jew himself explains, lies in blood, and this blood is forcing everyone to act according to these principles, whether he is the leading mind in a party that calls itself democratic, or calls itself socialist, or a man of science, literature, or just an ordinary exploiter. He is a Jew; he works aglow with one thought: How do I get my people to become the Master Race." > There is no retreat, no bastion that can hold forever. (etc) Yes, I read the rest. What we need though is a leader who's willing to step up and accomplish all of this. Not that I haven't been trying. This jew infested world is a pain in the ass when it comes to making an attempt at gaining a foothold. At least he came across six others who believed as he did, of the German worker's party. I'm constantly unindoctrinating others as they then take flight north when the realization hits. > "to survive" which is a vital reason but that is a defensive term. It is an attempt at a bulwark but not a vector of pushing forward. That works metaphorically. Let's talk literal. If survival was top on Hitler's list, Germany may not have lost. I admire the man for the true inspiring leader he is, but I must also admit the two faults he had. Not setting up extreme defense for his nation, and believing in the kike doctor Theodor Gilbert Morell's prognosis that his "light would go out at any minute". This put survival the furthest from Adolf's mind. What Germany needed was heavily militarized border and coastal forts, anti-aircraft and anti-tank gun emplacements everywhere. What he did was set up German soldiers in defense of other territories to prevent Bolsheviks from invading them. Numbers of soldiers were stretched too thin to defend Berlin, with massive amounts of cowardly faggots from Great Britain, Russia and America ganging up on a nation barely larger than Idaho. In the end, it was a jew's vile propaganda that did him in. That destroyed Germany and they continue to taint Hitler's name with their repulsive lies to this day.