>>/72478/
It is not so much self doubt but doubt about presentation. In my personal view, when discussing something of weight, you must strike hard and strike true lest you get bogged down in the semetic "concepts" entangling most topics that deliberately blur the heart of an issue. Poor wording or formatting can cause the blow to be misaligned or to miss entirely, hence my trepidation.
>>/72483/
The use of these words is a tricky thing, I ended up ingraining them into my posts some time ago back when Christian Identity attempted to subvert 8pol some years ago, it was the only way to scare the Nick Fuentes types back into their little pit. I aim these at anons but your quite right with the idea of forming them for more open consumption, striking a balance between board culture and the core of a message can be a tricky beast to tame. You also raise a good point on the images, in truth I... I actually do not know why I changed them. I wanted to reflect the values spoken of with a man who embodied them in his actions but as you point out the public perception of reality is warped beyond sane comprehension. I have considered formulating a PDF of a more "user friendly" version replacing the use of the harsher words while retaining a clear indicator of the parasites alterations to our culture and it's use of their golems but there is still a vast amount of /sig/ concepts that need to be covered before I undertake that project.
>>/72492/
You are correct in a manner but you cannot see the wheat through the chaff. We will never win over everyone, that is a pointless goal. However we do not need to win them all, we merely need to forge a path for those with the Will to stand, to show them there is a path through the dark. Each of us marches on, coming to the truth in a myriad of ways, moments of clarity bestowed by both experience and knowledge. The goal must be twofold, to show the parasites machinations and to demonstrate it can be broken, that is the purpose we must have.