fe.settings:getUserBoardSettings - non array given[pol] - Endchan Magrathea
 >>/84250/
A true statement but one bereft of deeper understanding of the role of a true Overman. A simple man, a man who desires merely a quiet life will always submit unless prompted through dire circumstances and even then mayhaps a fifty fifty split as to whether he will act. It does not fall to them but to those with the Will to lead them and guide them to greener pastures. Allow me to offer an example. It is said something around twenty percent of the European population of America is sympathetic to "extreme right wing views". It is often touted around as a partial "white pill", a message that "Shit maybe we can rise up right now" by those who share that message. However that is 20% of 54% of the overall population and something rarely asked is of that 20% how many would act in their own interests? Mayhaps 3%, 5% at a push? Let us consider, there are no real Men leading most nationalist movements, most of the time it's talking heads or paid subversives so that small figure makes perfect sense. But indulge me once more with contemplating an additional factor; what if that twenty percent had a leader they could effectively believe in? A genuine Man, one that could not merely match but build upon the ideals, strength and charisma of say Rockwell? You merely need to offer the people something they desire, something that transcends the material offerings of this miserable age. Something that the Man who leads them not only understands but truly believes in.

In the time of Nietzsche he saw the fall of the Church from prominence, he saw the ever growing corruption of the state, it is little wonder he wrote as he did. His words "God is dead" was not a mockery but a lament, a desperate plea to try and reinstate greater ideals via the medium of personal greatness. He saw Men with strength as no longer being pivotal in this new age he found himself in for he saw the rot within his world and believed that those of singular strength must rise above it which I will grant is true. But his work, at least in my opinion, became marred by the corruption he witnessed within what at the time was one the fundamental pillars of his society and his own peoples tacit acceptance of it and thanks to these observations he forgot that Man can only become greater if he aspires to something beyond him. An Overman created purely around himself is a narcissist however an Overman created in pursuit and in duty to something greater than himself can grow indefinitely. He becomes not merely a leader but a beacon, an example of all that a Man can be and thusly simpler men have a path to follow, a path shown by that individual towards a collective goal. This was one of the fundamental principles of our peoples prior to semetic subversion, a true "Will to power" but not in service to the self but in service to the greater be it his nation or his spiritual deity or in almost all cases both. Heroes were not born from a single avenue but from a culmination of the people and their higher ideals. With the modern world stripped of both our peoples understanding of themselves and our spirit we have a barren world bereft of Men of worth. It is our duty to make the soil fertile again so that greater Men may be made anew.