Actions
(157.69 KB, 841x1262)
(6.83 MB, 5056x2336)
>>/91309/ > It wasn't new land It was discovered by Hispanics because the people living in America were told about the rest of the world, and the people in the rest of the world were told about America. This is "inventio" (discovery). > Colon thought it was India This is a myth. The reason America was called "India" was because there were already three "Indias": 1) Pre-gangetic India (Middle East) 2) [Infra]-gangetic India (India) 3) Post-Gangetic India (the rest of Asia) America was the 4th India: Ultra-gangetic India. > declare it new land despite inhabitants That's NOT what happened. The Two Hegemonies of Europe modernized the legal codes of Native Americans (different writings, quipus, oral, etc). The Hispanic Monarchy acknowledged those lands as property of Native Americans, and Native Americans acknowledged they were citizens of the Hispanic Empire. In Spain, you can go to our archives and read many letters between Native Americans and the King of Spain himself. > Columbus' genealogy I'm not going to defend the guy, but talking too much about him shrouds the navigators and leaders of the expedition to discover America: The Pinzon brothers, who actually went back to Queen Isabel to report about the new land (not Columbus). > >Non-Hispanics did that. The word "Hispanic" comes from "Hispania", the name Rome gave to the Iberian Peninsula. In Spanish, the words "Español" (informal, Spaniard/Spanish) and "Hispanico" (formal, Hispanic) are the same. > Why, when I brought up the fact Spain is majority white, did you resort to saying BLOOD LIBELS, SLANDERS Because you imposed the same Black Legend which has been used to attack Hispanics for +500 years ("five centuries of fake news" as Spaniards call it). > and that Native Castilians plus Native Americans had more rights? To highlight how different is the Black Legend from history. Pic related is part of Queen Isabel's Last Will saying that Native Americans should be treated with love. > Is white supremacy something you believe exists? People should think and articulate whatever they want; and be with whomever they want WITHOUT consequences. Hispanic countries, especially in Central and South America, have traditionally had no problems with white only towns and cities. Conversely in Hispanic countries in Europe or in Mexico and Argentina, this "freedom from consequences" or "freedom of association" has withered. > Yes, I'm poking and prodding. There are no offensive questions in history. > I'm just trying to figure out what you are after you started this with "Anglo-Saxons Satanic hegemony". There is a book titled "Empire-phobia and Black Legend: Rome, Russia, United States and the Spanish Empire". The book explains the political phenomenon in which hegemonies are often vilified by other political entities which were previously attacked. English summary: https://www.corsarios.net/en/leyenda-en/imperiophobia-and-black-legend-maria-elvira-roca-barea/ Though we hispanists have no hate towards the Anglo-Saxons (IN FACT, many Anglo-Saxons are hispanists), their hegemony is different from ours. After the War of 1812, the United States started vilifying Hispanics; whether it was the Mexican-American War (which victimized Irish and Mexican Catholics) to the 1948 plan to genocide 80% of Spain (~22 million) with food embargoes. We understand know about the JEWS behind those aggression, but many people in the US seem to celebrate them and their accomplishments. (pic related) > Alamo We hispanists remember the Alamo, a name and a place that has no roots in the Anglosphere; there is reason why Anglo-Saxons in Europe stay away from that name and point their fingers to people in America each time it is mentioned.